Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
The same malign control by bosses and rings heretofore so often referred
to is directly responsible for this sad condition of affairs.
“Thus it would happen not infrequently that a state legislature
almost equally divided between the two parties would not have one
member in twenty or one in fifty whose nomination and election had
not been agreeable to forces behind the two machines, and whose
legislative action could not be counted upon by those who held the
party reins.... It is probably within the bounds of truth to say
that there is not one of our states which has not to a very
considerable extent come under the baneful influence of this
system, by means of which the political life of the people is
dominated and exploited for private ends by rich working
corporations in alliance with professional party politicians.”
(Shaw, _Political Problems_, pp. 148, 149.)
Professor Reinsch in his work hereinbefore referred to (_American
Legislatures_) gives an extended account of the means and methods of
legislative bribery through the lobby, resulting in “commercial
governments” and a situation where “any business man can get what he
wants at a reasonable price.” He describes the “boss” as the fruit and
flower of the system, his absolute authority, his endless tenure of
power, and the degrading influence of the machine. The reader will find
in this work much of interest on the subject of corrupt state
legislation which cannot be reproduced here.
The legislative evil record still continues to be made. The tree and the
fruit are the same year after year. In the session of 1919 forty-six
bills affecting New York City which passed both houses of the New York
Legislature were so flagrantly bad as to require and receive vetoes.
The Citizens Union of New York reported that twenty-eight additional
noxious city bills actually became laws. Allowing an equal grist for the
rest of the state and we have a total of one hundred and forty-eight
mischievous measures which passed both houses in one session. Of the
work of this very recent session of the New York Legislature, the New
York _Evening Post_, a very respectable paper, says (August 11, 1919),
“Despite the influence of the Governor and the efforts of the
legislative leaders, log-rolling, trading, and dickering continued
as usual. Carelessness and sloppiness were characteristic of the
session. In his veto messages the Governor called attention of the
members to this matter. Again and again bills slipped through one
house or the other in such shape that they had to be recalled and
repassed.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account