Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
Bryce condemns the giving the suffrage to the immigrants. “Such a
sacrifice of common sense to abstract principles has seldom been made by
any country.” But it is manifestly absurd to charge all our municipal
corruption upon the immigrants. Our native crop of controllable voters
far exceeds the imported one. Bryce is compelled to recognize the
situation in Philadelphia, where the Gas Ring ruled politics for a
generation by controlling the native American vote under American
managers. He says that “most of the corrupt leaders in Philadelphia are
not Irishmen, but Americans born and bred, and that in none of the
larger cities is the percentage of recent immigrants so small.”
(_American Commonwealth_, Vol. II, p. 421.) Though nothing will induce
Bryce, or any other British or American politician, to see the
deformities of manhood suffrage, yet he is willing to testify to the
facts. He says:
“There is no denying that the government of cities is the one
conspicuous failure of the United States.... In New York
extravagance, corruption and mismanagement have revealed themselves
on the largest scale.... But there is not a city with a population
exceeding 200,000 where the poison germs have not sprung into a
vigorous life; and in some of the smaller ones down to 70,000 it
needs no microscope to note the results of their growth. Even in
cities of the third rank similar phenomena may occasionally be
discerned.” (_American Commonwealth_, Vol. I, p. 608--quoted
approvingly by Rhodes, Vol. III, p. 62.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account