Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
was compelled to say that he saw no remedy for the sad state of affairs
which he described as existing in these six different cities.
The testimony from all sources and periods since 1840 goes to establish
the prevalence of municipal corruption and misgovernment. Here is
Ostrogorski, referring to the year 1872 and succeeding years:
“Almost all the cities whose population exceeded one hundred
thousand, or even a lesser figure, had their Rings. In the course
of these last years, many great cities, such as St. Louis,
Minneapolis, San Francisco, added new pages of disgrace to the
history of municipal corruption carried on under the flag of
political parties.” (_Democracy and Political Parties in the United
States_, pp. 84, 85.)
Another writer (J. B. Miller) states that the debts of the cities of the
Union rose in the twenty years from 1860 to 1880 from about $100,000,000
to $682,000,000; from 1860 to 1875 the increase of debt in our eighteen
largest cities was 270 per cent; the increase of taxation was 362 per
cent; whereas the increase in taxable valuation was but 157 per cent and
in population but 70 per cent. In 1883 the late Andrew D. White wrote as
follows:
“I wish to deliberately state a fact easy of verification--the fact
that whereas, as a rule, in other civilized countries municipal
Governments have been steadily improving until they have been made
generally honest and serviceable, our own, as a rule, are the
worst in the world, and they are steadily growing worse every
day.” (_Message of Nineteenth Century to Twentieth._)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account