Popular misgovernment in the United StatesCruikshank, Alfred Byron
History
Popular misgovernment in the United States
Cruikshank, Alfred Byron
Suffrage -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
“Observers of the local government and politics of the metropolis
during this period will remember that it was the time when the
local managers first organized on a large scale their schemes to
control, through compact political arrangements, the management and
distribution of the revenues of the city, which then amounted to so
large a sum, and it may be said that from that time to the present,
with the exception of one short but memorable period, the
disposition of these revenues has remained substantially in the
hands of the chiefs of trained political organizations, which are
mainly supported, in some form or other, from this fund.”
Again:
“In truth, the public debt of the city of New York, or the larger
part of it, represents a vast aggregate of moneys wasted, embezzled
or misapplied.”
This waste and theft of public money the report refers to had its direct
cause in the incapacity and rascality of public officials all or most of
whom as we know were chosen either directly or indirectly by manhood
suffrage. The report further says on this point:
“We place at the head of the list of evils under which our
municipal administration labors, the fact that so large a number of
important offices have come to be filled by men possessing little,
if any, fitness for the important duties they are called upon to
discharge.... There is a general failure, especially in the larger
cities, to secure the election or appointment of fit and competent
officials.... Animated by the expectation of unlawful emoluments
they expend large sums to secure their places and make promises
beforehand to supporters and retainers to furnish patronage or
place.”
Also:
“It would be clearly within bounds to say that more than one-half
of all the present city debts are the direct results of the species
of intentional and corrupt misrule above described.”
Further:
“We do not believe that, had the cities of this State during the
last twenty-five years had the benefit of the presence in the
various departments of local administration of the services of
competent and faithful officers, the aggregate of municipal debts
would have amounted to one-third of the present sum, nor the annual
taxation one-half of its present amount; while the condition of
those cities in respect to existing provisions for the public
needs would have been far superior to what is now exhibited.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account