through the arc _BD_ to the height of the horizontal _CD_. Now
gentlemen, you will be pleased to see the ball rise to the
horizontal line at the point _G_, and the same thing also happen if
the nail be placed lower as at _F_, in which case the ball would
describe the arc _BJ_, always terminating its ascent precisely at
the line _CD_. If the nail be placed so low that the length of
thread below it does not reach to the height of _CD_ (which would
happen if _F_ were nearer _B_ than to the intersection of _AB_ with
the horizontal _CD_), then the thread will wind itself about the
nail. This experiment leaves no room for doubt as to the truth of
the supposition. For as the two arcs _CB_, _DB_ are equal and
similarly situated, the momentum acquired in the descent of the arc
_CB_ is the same as that acquired in the descent of the arc _DB_;
but the momentum acquired at _B_ by the descent through the arc
_CB_ is capable of driving up the same moving body through the arc
_BD_; hence also the momentum acquired in the descent _DB_ is equal
to that which drives the same moving body through the same arc from
_B_ to _D_, so that in general every momentum acquired in the
descent of an arc is equal to that which causes the same moving
body to ascend through the same arc; but all the momenta which
cause the ascent of all the arcs _BD_, _BG_, _BJ_, are equal since
they are made by the same momentum acquired in the descent _CB_, as
the experiment shows: therefore all the momenta acquired in the
descent of the arcs _DB_, _GB_, _JB_ are equal."
[Illustration: Fig. 43.]
The remark relative to the pendulum may be applied to the inclined plane
and leads to the law of inertia. We read on page 124:[45]
"It is plain now that a movable body, starting from rest at _A_ and
descending down the inclined plane _AB_, acquires a velocity
proportional to the increment of its time: the velocity possessed
at _B_ is the greatest of the velocities acquired, and by its
nature immutably impressed, provided all causes of new acceleration
or retardation are taken away: I say acceleration, having in view
its possible further progress along the plane extended;
retardation, in view of the possibility of its being reversed and
made to mount the ascending plane _BC_. But in the horizontal plane
_GH_ its equable motion, according to its velocity as acquired in
the descent from _A_ to _B_, will be continued _ad infinitum_."
(Fig. 44.)
[Illustration: Fig. 44.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account