Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.Tissandier, Gaston
Science
Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.
Tissandier, Gaston
Scientific recreations
When examining algæ under the microscope, we notice the spaces which
separate the streaks ornamenting the silicious covering of these
various organisms, and it is explained that they are formed by hexagons
visible only when we examine the object with a powerful microscope.
“For a long time,” says M. Nachet, “I occupied myself with the
examination of the hexagonal appearance of the points constituting
the streaks. Why should these hexagons show themselves, and how could
they be other than the visible base of small pyramids piled very
closely one on the other; and if this were the case, why were not the
points of the little pyramids visible? Or, was the structure before me
analogous to that of the eyes of insects? Then the carapace would be
but a surface of perforated polygonal openings. This latter hypothesis
was attractive enough, and would have explained many things; but some
careful observations with very powerful object-glasses, quite free
from blemishes, had shown me that these hexagons had round points,
contrary to the descriptions of micrographs. These observations,
corroborated by the micrographic photographs of Lackerbauer, the
much-regretted designer, and by Colonels Woodward and Washington, left
not the slightest doubt that it was necessary to discover why the
eye persistently saw hexagons where there were circles. To elucidate
this point, it was necessary to find some means of reproducing
artificially what nature had accomplished with so much precision on
the surfaces of algæ. After many fruitless attempts, I decided on
making a trial of a stereotype plate covered with dots arranged in
quincunxes, very close together” (figs. 132 and 133). “The result was
more successful than I had hoped; the effect produced is exactly that
of the arrangement of the so-called hexagons of the most beautiful
of the algæ, the _Pleurosigma angulata_. If these stereotypes are
examined with one eye only, we shall be immediately convinced that we
have to do with hexagonal polygons.” It is useless to give any long
exposition of a figure so clearly explanatory; it is simply an effect
of the contrast and opposition of the black and white in the sensation
of the retina. This effect is particularly striking with fig. 134, a
negative photograph heliographically engraved according to fig. 133.
In this the white points seem to destroy the black spaces, and to
approach each other tangentially, and the irradiation is so intense
that the white circles appear much larger than the black of fig. 133,
although of the same diameter. There are in these facts many points
which may interest not only students of micrography, but also artists.
As to the algæ, the origin of this investigation, it remains to be
discovered if these circles which cover their silicious carapace are
the projection of small hemispheres, or the section of openings made in
the thick covering. Certain experiments, however, seem to prove that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account