Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.Tissandier, Gaston
Science
Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.
Tissandier, Gaston
Scientific recreations
the design moved in a circular manner on the screen, and in this case
also there existed the illusion that every circle seemed turning round
its centre. And what is the explanation of these curious effects? Mr.
Thompson does not believe (and we share his opinion) that the faculty
possessed by the retina of preserving images during a certain time
(_persistence of impressions on the retina_) can entirely explain these
phenomena. Without desiring to formulate a decided theory, Mr. Thompson
is of opinion that we may class these facts with others which have been
known for some time, and that perhaps it is necessary to attribute to
the eye some new faculty which may explain the whole at once.
[Illustration: Fig. 137.—Another figure of Mr. Thompson’s. The
different circles appear to turn round if we give the design a rotating
movement.]
Brewster and Adams have described phenomena which are equally curious,
the principal of which we will describe, adding also some analogous
investigations due to Mr. Thompson. The result seems to be that there
exists in the eye a badly-defined purpose of nature, which in a certain
way _compensates_ (Brewster) for the real phenomenon, because it has a
contrary effect, which will continue for some time after the cessation
of the phenomena, and which gives by itself a sensation contrary to
that which the real movement would have produced. Thus, after having
fixed our eyes for two or three minutes on a rushing waterfall, if we
suddenly turn our glance on the adjacent rocks, the latter appear to
move from top to bottom. It is not a question here of the effect of
the relative movement to be observed on regarding _simultaneously_ the
falling water and the rocks; if one can succeed in abstracting oneself
to such an extent that the water appears motionless, the rocks appear
to take a contrary movement. In the phenomenon we describe there is no
simultaneous comparison; the eyes are turned _successively_ first on
the water, and then on the rocks. In a rapid river, such as the Rhine
above the fall at Schaffhausen, the stream is not equally swift in
every part, and the current is noticeably more rapid in the middle of
the river than near the banks. If we look fixedly at the centre of the
stream, and then suddenly turn our eyes towards the banks, it will
appear as though the river were flowing back towards its source. This
kind of _compensation_ does not only produce an apparent displacement,
but also changes in size. When travelling at great speed in a railway
train, the objects of the surrounding country as one flies by them
gradually appear smaller and smaller. If, when this occurs, we suddenly
remove our eyes to the interior of the railway carriage, and fix them
on immovable objects, such as the sides of the compartment, or the
faces of our travelling companions, the images on the retina will
really preserve the same size, and yet the objects will appear larger.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account