Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.Tissandier, Gaston
Science
Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.
Tissandier, Gaston
Scientific recreations
Volta constructed the pile which bears his name, on the assumption
that “every two heterogeneous bodies form a galvanic circle or arc in
which electricity is generated.” The “pile” consisted of a number of
discs of zinc and copper separated by discs of card soaked in water.
This combination of metals separated by a bad conductor, developed
considerable electricity, the “positive” going to the zinc at the top,
and the “negative” turning to the opposite end. By touching the zinc
and copper extremities simultaneously with wetted fingers we shall
experience a shock. “I don’t need your frog,” Volta said, when he had
proved his theory; “give me two metals and a moist rag, and I will
produce your animal electricity. Your frog is nothing but a moist
conductor, and in this respect it is inferior to my wet rag!”
[Illustration: Fig. 219.—Voltaic Pile.]
After this discovery the theory of animal electricity died away for
many years, till in 1825, Nobili, and afterwards Matteucci, proved the
existence of galvanic currents in muscles.
After Volta had succeeded in obtaining a shock from his “pile,”
he proceeded to the construction of another instrument, or rather
apparatus, which he denominated “Couronne des tasses” (fig. 220). It
consisted of a series of small glasses containing water or a saline
solution. He then procured a number of “metallic arcs,” partly composed
of zinc and partly of copper; these were inserted into the glasses, so
that every glass contained the zinc of one and the copper of another
arc, not in contact, but one at the right hand the other at the left.
The electro motion, supposed to be the primary cause of the galvanic
action, was thus produced as well as from the “pile.” The principle was
just the same in both apparatus, the metals being divided by the water
in one case, and by a wet card or cloth in the other.
Volta, in 1800, addressed to the Royal Society his celebrated letter
upon electricity excited by contact of conducting substances, and then
the English philosophers proceeded to make further experiments. It
was Fabroni of Florence who had just before suggested that chemical
action was really the cause of the phenomena exhibited. Sir Humphrey
Davy warmly advocated this theory, and made numerous experiments with
the view to establish it. Nicholson, Carlisle, and Cruickshank also
paid great attention to the subject. Volta, although he had laid the
foundation, did not venture to build upon it. Messrs. Nicholson and
Carlisle found the two kinds of electricity in the pile, the zinc
being positive and the silver negative. They also found that the
water was decomposed both in the circuit and in the body of the pile.
Subsequently Cruickshank confirmed Nicholson’s observations, and made
use of what is termed the “trough” apparatus. He found that hydrogen
was emitted from the silver or upper end, and oxygen from the other.
[Illustration: Fig. 220.—Volta’s couronne des tasses.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account