Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.Tissandier, Gaston
Science
Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.
Tissandier, Gaston
Scientific recreations
It was Œrsted who observed that when a magnet is placed within reach of
an electric current and free to move, it sets itself at right angles
to the direction of the current; and Ampère defined the law already
referred to when treating of the electric current,—viz., “that if a
person be imagined as placed in the wire so that the current shall pass
through him from feet to head, if he turn his face toward the magnetic
needle the north pole will always be deflected to his left-hand side.”
When the current is passed above the needle from south to north poles,
the deflection is to the west; when from north to south the deflection
is east. When the current is below the needle the contrary is the
case. Ampère decided that currents circulating in the same direction
attracted each other, and when running in opposite ways they repelled
each other. He supposed currents to circulate within all magnetic
substances, and then—that is, when the body is magnetized—these
currents flow in planes parallel to each other, and the material which
offers the least resistance to the circulation of these currents
becomes the most magnetic.
The earth being supposed to be an immense magnet has currents
circulating through it in a direction from east to west; and having the
property or power of turning a magnetized bar in a direction similar
to that in which the bar would be turned by a magnet, the earth is
considered a magnetic mass. This influence is due to what is called
“terrestrial magnetism.” If we suspend a bar by a thread it will point
in no particular direction, but may be turned towards any side we
please. But when once the needle is magnetized it will point north and
south; or, as we say (but not correctly), the north pole of the magnet
points to the north of the globe. It is really the south pole that
points to the north, and the north pole of the magnet points _south_,
as can be proved by suspending the bar over another magnetized bar. So
if the earth be considered a magnet our English terms are inconsistent
with our theories. Continental writers are more correct.
The line of the magnetic needle’s direction, which differs in different
places, is called the magnetic meridian, and the amount of its
divergence from the astronomical meridian is termed its declination or
variation. When the amount of this variation is known it is allowed
for, and the needle can be considered as pointing due north and south.
But the needle does not assume a position perfectly parallel to the
horizon. It dips down in different hemispheres. As we approach the
north pole the dip or inclination will become greater, and the same
effect is observable at the south pole. Again, there are certain places
on the earth where the attraction is so evenly balanced that the needle
is perfectly horizontal. The line uniting these places is the magnetic
equator. This does not coincide with the earth’s equator any more than
the magnetic poles coincide with the geographical poles of the earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account