Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.Tissandier, Gaston
Science
Popular Scientific Recreations: in Natural Philosphy, Astronomy, Geology, Chemistry, etc., etc., etc.
Tissandier, Gaston
Scientific recreations
It is observable that the properties of lightning and of the electric
spark are identical—the faint crackle of the latter being magnified
into the loud rolling of the thunder. The disturbance of the atmosphere
is the cause of the loud reverberations, and echoes produced from
clouds tend to intensify and prolong the peal. The sound rises and
falls, and varies accordingly as the cloud is near or far. A smart
sharp report or rattle denotes the nearness of the lightning, while the
gradual swelling and subsidence, followed, mayhap, by an increasing
volume of sound, which in its turn dies away, tells us that the danger
is not imminent. The cause o£ this loud rolling, unless it proceeds
from echoes from different clouds, has not been satisfactorily
explained. Sound travels less quickly than light, and therefore we
only hear the thunder some seconds after we have perceived the flash.
It is therefore conceivable that we may hear the last reverberations
and its echoes first, and the sound of the first disturbance with its
echoes last of all. Thus there will be distinct sounds. Firstly, the
actual noise we call thunder from the air strata _nearest_ to us;
secondly, the echoes of that disturbance from the clouds, of course
fainter; then we hear the sound caused by the tearing asunder of the
air particles farthest off, and again the echoes of that disturbance.
This theory will, we think, account for the swelling peals of thunder,
and the successive loud and fainter reverberations. At any rate, in the
absence of any other theory, we submit it for consideration. The sound
of thunder is seldom or never heard at a distance greater than fifteen
miles.
Lightning conductors are such every-day objects that no description is
necessary; but the reason the lightning runs along it harmlessly is
because the galvanized iron rod is the best conductor in the immediate
neighbourhood. Where there is not a good conductor lightning will
accept the next best, and so on, any conductor being better than none.
The point of the rod cannot contain any electricity, there being no
room for it, and the “fluid,” as it is termed, runs down to the ground,
to terminate, when possible, in water or charcoal. A great deal of
electricity is no doubt carried away from the air by the numerous
conductors without any spark passing. Until Sir W. Snow Harris brought
forward his lightning conductors for ships, the loss was great at sea.
But now we rarely hear of any vessel being disabled by lightning. We
owe to Franklin the idea of the lightning conductor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account