[136] The word ‘china’ is used in this sense, I think, by no other
European nation.
[137] See, however, for the Portuguese merchants who sold porcelain in
France, the note on page 230.
[138] The Abbé Raynal, writing about 1770, says that connoisseurs
divide Oriental porcelain into six classes--‘_truitée_, _vieille
blanche_, _de Japon_, _de Chine_, _le Japon Chiné et la porcelaine des
Indes_.’
[139] Marryat’s extracts are unfortunately often carelessly quoted;
nor is it easy in all cases to control them by reference to the
originals.
[140] August II. certainly bought a collection of porcelain from the
Bassetouche family for 6750 thalers. It would be interesting to know
of what wares this collection consisted. The only further additions
until quite recent times have been to the European department.
[141] The tradition of the ‘dinner-service’ made in China for Charles
V., and presented by him to Moritz of Saxony (or, as others say,
captured from him by that prince), belongs to the same category of
stories as that of the crusader’s cup. No such commission as this
was possible at so early a date, and there is nothing in the Dresden
collection that could be connected with such a service.
[142]
‘Menez-moi chez les Portugais
Nous y verrons à peu de frais
Des marchandises de la Chine
... de la porcelaine fine,’ etc.--Scarron, _Paris Burlesque_.
[143] In 1689 Madame de Sévigné notes the quantity of Oriental
porcelain imported at L’Orient.
[144] Are we to identify these with some huge Imari vases, now in the
Louvre, with coats of arms bearing the French lilies and the label of
Orleans? Some similar vases, with the same arms, have lately been seen
in dealers’ shops in London.
[145] The catalogues of Gersaint and of some other early French
collections may be found at South Kensington.
[146] Passeri, writing in 1752 in favour of the then neglected
majolica, claims that ‘la parte brutale dell’ uomo sarà a favor delle
porcellane, ma l’intellettuale e raziocinativa giudicherà a favor
delle nostre majoliche.’
[147] Recent researches in the archives of Venice have proved that
Oriental porcelain was comparatively abundant in Venice at the
beginning of the sixteenth century. Dr. Ludwig has shown me extracts
from the inventory of the property of a rich ‘cittadino’ who died in
1526, in which can be distinguished plain white, blue and white, and
porcelain decorated with red, green, and gold.
[148] It is quite possible that Palissy may have tried his hand at
this problem. M. Solon has suggested that in the many years’ labour
at Saintes (when attempting especially to imitate ‘the cup with white
enamel’) Palissy was really seeking to make porcelain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account