Portuguese literatureBell, Aubrey F. G. (Aubrey Fitz Gerald)
History
Portuguese literature
Bell, Aubrey F. G. (Aubrey Fitz Gerald)
Portuguese literature -- History and criticism
the time of Miranda’s death, it copied the form of Greek tragedies
and, the better to acclimatize this, a thoroughly national subject
was chosen--the death of Inés--whereas Miranda had gone to Rome and
Egypt. As might be expected from Ferreira’s other work the conception
was executed with the careful skill of a conscientious craftsman. The
drama has unity, the style is purest Portuguese, the chorus sometimes
soars into poetry, as in the celebrated passage _Quando amor naceo_.
That the same high language is spoken throughout, that, as has often
been observed, scenes of dramatic opportunity--a meeting between D.
Pedro and his father or Inés--are omitted, merely shows that Ferreira
had no dramatic instinct. Perhaps the only dramatic passage--and
even so it is of more psychological than dramatic interest--is that
in Act III: _Inés._ ‘Ah, woe is me! what ill, what fearful ill dost
thou announce?’ _Chorus._ ‘It is thy death.’ _Inés._ ‘_Is my lord
dead?_’ Nevertheless, the play was a remarkable achievement, carried
out without faltering and with a sustained loftiness worthy of its
subject. No one any longer believes that Ferreira copied from the
_Nise lastimosa_ by Geronimo Bermudez, published under the pseudonym
Antonio da Silva eight years after Ferreira’s death. This is a
slightly expanded Spanish translation, closely following the 1587
edition[374] of _Inés de Castro_, which differs considerably from
that of 1598. The _Nise laureada_ which accompanied it is perfectly
insignificant. Like Miranda, Ferreira wrote, besides one tragedy, two
comedies, _Bristo_ and _O Cioso_. There are indications that he had
in mind Ferreira de Vasconcellos’ _Eufrosina_ as well as Miranda’s
comedies. Bristo soliloquizing is the counterpart of Philtra, and in
his dedication of _Bristo_ to Prince João he acknowledges his debt
to previous plays.[375] In this comedy, written during some vacation
days at Coimbra University, the action is very primitive, but the
braggart Annibal and the charlatan Montalvão account for some farcical
scenes. His later play, _O Cioso_ (the jealous husband is also handled
by Gil Vicente and Prestes), belongs to a higher plane, i. e. to
comedy rather than farce, although _Bristo_ is not entirely devoid of
character-drawing. _Bristo_ was ‘made public’ (_publicada_) before
1554, but neither play was published till 1622. Both are remarkable for
the correctness and concise vigour of their prose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account