Postal service -- United States -- Second-class matter
If, as has been reported, a certain railroad president ever
did utter the famous phrase attributed to him, “the public
be damned,” the public has more than gotten even. It does
the damning itself nowadays instead, and so effective is its
verdict that we are even confronted with the spectacle of the
government itself bowing to the popular prejudice irrespective
of the facts in the case. Undoubtedly we have become a nation
of stone-throwers. To a certain extent this has worked for
the public benefit. Every deserved stone has worked for the
correction of admitted evils. But so rapidly has the public
taken to the lately discovered pastime of stone-throwing that it
not infrequently uses its strength like a giant, and that, we
have been told, is tyrannous. Let a corporation raise its head
nowadays and it is greeted by a shower of stones of which perhaps
not ten per cent. are intelligently cast. The only thing to do in
such a case is to “duck;” argument becomes futile in the heat of
battle.…
That is sufficient to show the “style.” The article then proceeds to
give some mail-service history and to cite a few points wherein by
“arbitrary” rulings the government is grievously wronging the railroads
in under-paying them for the carrying of the mails. The following is one
of the _strong_ points or arguments presented:
Furthermore, the railroads hold that an additional injustice was
done in this connection in the adoption of the present methods of
determining the weights. In addition to the several reductions
from the act of 1873 above mentioned, and in spite of the fact
that various government committees admitted their injustice, a
singular order amounting practically to a _juggling of weights
in favor of the government_ was issued under the date of June 7,
1907.
Under the date of March 2, 1907, the following order was issued:
“When the weight of mail is taken on the railway routes, the
whole number of days the mails are weighed shall be used as a
divisor for obtaining the weight per day.”
But under date of June 7, 1907, a surprising order was issued reading as
follows:
“When the weight of mail is taken on railway routes, the whole
number of days _included_ in the weighing period should be used
as a divisor for obtaining the average weight per day.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account