Practical Religion: Being Plain Papers on the Daily Duties, Experience, Dangers, and Privileges of Professing ChristiansRyle, J. C. (John Charles)
Religion
Practical Religion: Being Plain Papers on the Daily Duties, Experience, Dangers, and Privileges of Professing Christians
Ryle, J. C. (John Charles)
Christian life -- Anglican authors
"2. Nor to admit of any adoration either of the Sacramental
bread and wine there bodily received, or of any corporal
presence of Christ's Natural Body and Blood:
"3. Nor to justify the belief that the Body and Blood are again
offered as a satisfaction for sin; seeing that the offering of
Christ once made was a perfect redemption, propitiation, and
satisfaction for the sins of the whole world, original and
actual.
"These are the limits which our Church imposes upon the liberty
of interpretation of the words of our blessed Lord.
"The use of these sacrificial vestments is in the minds of many
intimately connected with the idea that an essential element in
the Holy Communion is the offering to God a Sacrifice of the
Body and Blood of Christ, which abide with the elements in a
mysterious manner after the act of Consecration. The minister
wears the vestments at that time as a sacrificing priest.
According to this view it would seem that the most important
part of this Holy Sacrament is what we offer to God, not what
we receive from Him.
"This view is not recognised by the Church of England in her
formularies. The general definition in the XXVth Article states
that Sacraments are 'certain sure witnesses and effectual signs
of grace, by the which [God] doth work invisibly in us;' and it
is said specifically of the Lord's Supper (Art. XXVIII.), that
it 'is a Sacrament of our Redemption by Christ's death:
insomuch that to such as rightly, worthily, and with faith,
receive the same, the Bread which we break is a partaking of
the Body of Christ; and likewise the Cup of Blessing is a
partaking of the Blood of Christ.' The idea of the Sacrifice of
that Body and Blood finds no place in either of these strict
definitions. The Catechism speaks the same language when it
defines a Sacrament to be 'an outward and visible sign of an
inward and spiritual grace given unto us.' Nor will an
examination of the Office of the Holy Communion itself give any
countenance to the idea in question. The only distinct oblation
or offering mentioned in that Office is previous to the
Consecration of the elements, in the Prayer for the Church
Militant, and therefore cannot be an offering or sacrifice of
the Body and Blood of Christ; and the only sacrifice which we
are spoken of as making, is the offering of 'ourselves, our
souls and bodies, to be a reasonable, holy, and lively
sacrifice.'[3] Our Church seems most studiously to have avoided
any expression which could countenance the notion of a
perpetual Sacrifice of Christ, while on the other hand it
speaks of Christ's death upon the cross as 'His own oblation of
Himself once offered as a full, perfect, and sufficient
sacrifice for the sins of the whole world.' No room is left for
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account