[99] The criticisms of which I am thinking are (to select but a few from memory) Green’s well-known admission in respect of Hegelianism, that it would have “to be done all over again”; Mr. Bradley’s admission that he is “not a Hegelian” and (recently) that he has “seen too much of metaphysics” to place any serious weight upon its reasonings; Jowett’s complaint (in the “life” by Campbell) that the Oxford Hegelianism of his day was teaching students to place an undue reliance upon “words” and “concepts” in the place of facts and things; Dr. Bosanquet’s admission (many years ago) that, of course, “gods and men” were more than “bloodless categories”; Professor Pringle Pattison’s criticism of Hegel in his _Hegelianism and Personality_; Professor Baillie’s criticisms at the end of his _Logic of Hegel_; Mr. Sturt’s criticism of Neo-Hegelianism in his _Idola Theatri_, etc. [100] See the following, for example, from Professor Stout: “Every agreeable or disagreeable sensation has a conative or quasi-conative aspect” (_Manual of Psychology_, p. 233). Also: “Perception is never merely cognitive” (_ibid._ p. 242); it has a “conative character and a feeling tone,” etc. [101] A. Sidgwick’s “Applied Axioms” (_Mind_, N.S. xiv. p. 42). This is extremely useful, connecting the recent pragmatist movement with the work of the English logicians. See in the same connexion the articles of Captain Knox in the _Quarterly Review_ (April 1909) on “Pragmatism.” [102] During the last ten years _Mind_ has contained articles on the pragmatist controversy by nearly all our prominent academic authorities: Dr. Bradley, Dr. McTaggart, Professor Taylor, Professor Hoernle, Dr. Schiller, Dr. Mellone, Dr. Boyce-Gibson, Mr. Hobhouse, and so on. [103] Particularly in his valuable book on _Truth_ in which the weakness of the Hegelian conception of truth is set forth along with that of other views. [104] In _Idealism as a Practical Creed_, in his _Browning as a Religious and Philosophical Teacher_, and elsewhere. [105] In his _Elements of Metaphysic_, and in many of his recent reviews; in his review, for example, of Professor Bosanquet’s _Individuality and Value_, in the _Review of Theology and Philosophy_, and in his Mind (July 1912) review of Professor Ward’s _Realm of Ends_. [106] In his book upon the _Philosophy of Eucken_, in _God With Us_, and elsewhere. [107] In _Idola Theatri_ (an important criticism of Neo-Hegelian writers), and elsewhere. [108] In _Essays in Philosophical Construction_, and in his book upon Logic. [109] In his _Introduction to Logic_. [110] See p. 154. [111] “If God has this perfect authority and perfect knowledge, His authority cannot rule us, nor His knowledge know us, or any human thing; just as our authority does not extend to the gods, nor our knowledge know anything which is divine; so by parity of reason they, being gods, are not our masters, neither do they know the things of men” (_Parmenides_, 134, Jowett’s _Plato_, vol. iv.).