Marriage is called a lottery, and it is thought, like all other
lotteries, there are more blanks than prizes; yet is it not made more
precarious than it ought to be, by our neglect of that degree of
precaution which we would be ridiculed for omitting in conducting our
every-day concerns? Is not the standard of matrimonial felicity placed
too low? Ought we not to look more to the possession of principles than
to the possession of wealth? Or is it at all justifiable in a Christian
to commit a child, a daughter, to the keeping of a man who wants the
very essential they acknowledge most necessary to constitute a perfect
character? Most men revolt at infidelity in a woman, and most men,
however licentious themselves, look for, at least, the exterior of
religion in their wives. The education of their children is a serious
responsibility; and although seldom conducted on such rules as will
stand the test of reason, it is not to be entirely shaken off: they
choose their early impressions should be correct, their infant conduct
at least blameless. And are not one half mankind of the male sex? Are
precepts in religion, in morals, only for females? Are we to reverse the
theory of the Mahommedans, and though we do not believe it, act as if
men had no souls. Is not the example of the father as important to the
son as that of the mother to the daughter? In short, is there any
security against the commission of enormities, but an humble and devout
dependence on the assistance of that Almighty Power, which alone is able
to hold us up against temptation?
Uniformity of taste is no doubt necessary to what we call love, but is
not taste acquired? Would our daughters admire a handsome deist, if
properly impressed with a horror of his doctrines, sooner than they now
would admire a handsome Mahommedan? We would refuse our children to a
pious dissenter, to give them to impious members of the establishment:
we make the substance less than the shadow.
Our principal characters are possessed of these diversified views of the
evils to be averted. Mrs. Wilson considers Christianity an indispensable
requisite in the husband to be permitted to her charge, and watches
against the possibility of any other than a Christian's gaining the
affections of Emily. Lady Chatterton considers the want of an
establishment as the unpardonable sin, and directs her energies to
prevent this evil; while John Moseley looks upon a free will as the
birthright of an Englishman, and is, at the present moment, anxiously
alive to prevent the dowager's making him the husband of Grace, the
thing of all others he most strenuously desires.
Chapter XVIII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account