Prejudices, fifth seriesMencken, H. L. (Henry Louis)
History
Prejudices, fifth series
Mencken, H. L. (Henry Louis)
American essays -- 20th century; American literature -- History and criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
What a novel is in him! Indeed, what a shelf of novels! For he has
as many forms as there are varieties of human delusion. Sometimes
he is a tin-pot evangelist, sweating to transform Oklahoma City or
Altoona, Pa., into the New Jerusalem. Sometimes he is a hireling of the
Anti-Saloon League, sworn to Law Enforcement. Sometimes he is a strict
Sabbatarian, bawling for the police whenever he detects his neighbor
washing bottles or varnishing the Ford on Sunday morning. Again he is a
vice-crusader, chasing the scarlet lady with fierce Christian shouts.
Yet again he is a comstock, wearing out his eyes in the quest for smut.
He may even be female--a lady Ph.D. in a linoleum hat, patrolling
the cow towns and the city slums, handing out edifying literature,
teaching poor Polish women how to have babies. Whatever his form,
he is tremendously grotesque and tremendously amusing--and always he
drips with national juices, always he is as thoroughly American as a
bootlegger or a college yell. If he exists at all in other lands, it is
only in rudimentary and aberrant forms. Try to imagine a French Wayne
B. Wheeler, or a Spanish Billy Sunday, or a German William Jennings
Bryan. It is as impossible as imagining a Coolidge in the Rome of
Julius.
Since the earliest days, as everyone knows, American jurisprudence has
been founded upon the axiom that it is the first duty of every citizen
to police his neighbors, and especially those he envies, or otherwise
dislikes. There is no such thing, in this grand and puissant nation,
as privacy. The yokels out in Iowa, neglecting their horned cattle,
have a right, it appears--nay, a sacred duty!--to peek into my home in
Baltimore, and tell me what I may and may not drink with my meals. An
out-at-elbow Methodist preacher in Boston sets himself up to decide
what I may read. An obscure and unintelligent job-holder in Washington,
inspired by God, determines what I may receive in the mails. I must
not buy lottery tickets because it offends the moral sentiment of
Kansas. I must keep Sunday as the Sabbath, which is in conflict with
Genesis, because it is ordered by persons who believe that Genesis
can’t be wrong. Such are the laws of the greatest free nation ever
seen on earth. We are all governed by them. But a government of laws,
of course, is a mere phantasm of political theorists: the thing is
always found, on inspection, to be really a government of men. In the
United States, it seems to me, the tendency is for such men to come
increasingly from the class of professional uplifters. It is not the
bankers who run the ostensible heads of the state, as the Liberals
believe, nor the so-called bosses, as the bosses themselves believe,
but the wowsers. And what is a wowser? What does the word mean? It
means precisely what you think of inevitably when you hear it. A wowser
is a wowser. He bears a divine commission to regulate and improve the
rest of us. He knows exactly what is best for us. He is what Howe calls
a Good Man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account