Prejudices, fifth seriesMencken, H. L. (Henry Louis)
History
Prejudices, fifth series
Mencken, H. L. (Henry Louis)
American essays -- 20th century; American literature -- History and criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
This he does in his book, and up to the limit of his forensic skill,
which, I regret to have to add, is not noticeably great. If, at times,
he grows a bit muddled, and even maudlin, then let us not hold the
fact against him, for a man performing a _pas seul_ upon a red-hot
stove cannot be expected to achieve an impeccable step. It seems to
me that this red-hot stove, at the moment, is under every conscious
“Anglo-Saxon” in our great Republic--that he must be an insensate clod,
indeed, if he does not feel the heat. The cultural leadership of the
country is passing out of his hands, and he is beginning to lose even
his political hegemony. I sat in the Democratic National Convention
in 1924 as the Hon. Al Smith rolled up his votes, and watched the Ku
Kluxers on the floor. They were transfixed with horror: if it was a
comedy, then pulling tonsils is also a comedy. Dr. Abbott mentions
Dreiser. The influence of Dreiser upon the literature of to-morrow in
this land--upon all the youngsters who are now coming to maturity in
the universities, and turning away from their ordained professors--will
be a hundred times as potent as that of any New Englander now alive.
Who is Dreiser? When the grandfathers of the Republic were hanging
witches at Salem his forbears were raising grapes on the Rhine. Dr.
Abbott professes history at Harvard. During the past ten years but one
professor at that great university has materially colored the stream
of ideas in America. He has since escaped abroad--and is a Spaniard.
Every day a new Catholic church goes up; every day another Methodist or
Presbyterian church is turned into a garage. But there is no need to
labor the point. The fact is too obvious that the old easy dominance
of the “Anglo-Saxon” is passing, that he must be up and doing if he
would fasten his notions upon the generations to come. And the fact
is equally obvious that his success in that emprise, so far, has been
extremely indifferent--that, despite the great advantages that he
enjoys, of position, of authority, of ancient right, he is making very
heavy weather of it, and not even holding his own. I am frankly against
him, and believe, as I have often made known, that he is doomed--that
his opponents will turn out, in the long run, to be better men than
he is. But I confess that I’d enjoy the combat more if he showed less
indignation and more skill.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account