Premature Burial and How It May Be PreventedTebb, William
Science
Premature Burial and How It May Be Prevented
Tebb, William
Burial, Premature
Several writers, besides Dr. Winslow, whose views on premature burial
are cited in this volume, have themselves been the victims of hasty
and erroneous medical diagnosis; and, having had narrow escapes of
premature burial, their experience has prompted them to take a deep
interest in the subject, with the determination to do what they could
to enlighten and safeguard the public from so terrible a danger. In
other cases, members of their families have been the unhappy victims
of mistaken certificates. Mr. George T. Angell, the editor of “_Dumb
Animals_,” Boston, U.S., whose father was pronounced by his physician
dead, and returned to consciousness after preparations for the funeral
had been made, has repeatedly alluded to the subject in his paper,
and published preventive suggestions at various times, including the
following from a physician:--
“When I arrived, the man had been dead twenty-four hours. I empanelled
a jury; the family of the deceased testified to the extent of their
knowledge; but I was unable to find he had any disease sufficient
to kill him. I looked at the body and examined it carefully. Then I
lighted a match, and applied it to the end of one of the fingers of
the corpse. Immediately a blister formed. I had the man put back into
his bed, applied various restoratives, and to-day he is alive and
well.
“That is the test. Do you see the philosophy of it? If you are alive,
you cannot burn your hand without raising a blister. Nature, in the
effort to protect the inner tissues, throws a covering of water, a
non-conductor of heat, between the fire and the flesh. If you were
dead, and flames should come in contact with any part of your body, no
blister would appear, and the flesh would be burned.
“All you have to do is to apply a match to any part of the supposed
corpse. If life remains, however little, a blister will at once form.”
The test, like the following one, is deceptive, because life may be so
torpid and inactive as to be unable to respond to the irritation of
heat, or even to the application of red hot irons.
THE BLISTER TEST.
The _British Medical Journal_, January 18, 1896, p. 180, under the head
of “Living or Dead?” prints the following communication concerning this
test:--
[THE BLISTER TEST.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account