Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 3 (of 7)Roosevelt, Theodore
History
Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 3 (of 7)
Roosevelt, Theodore
Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919; United States -- Politics and government -- 1901-1909
The way to pay effective homage to the men of the mighty past is to
live decently and efficiently in the present. We have a right to expect
that every society like this shall be a nucleus for patriotic endeavor
in the affairs of the day. Now, in studying the past I wish that
societies like this would pay heed not only to what is pleasant for us
to read about, but also to what is unpleasant. I do not think that a
diet of all praise is good for any one, and it is no better for us as a
body politic than for any one of us individually. Admiral Coghlan will
tell you that the first step necessary in bringing the Navy up to its
present standard of marksmanship was having the Navy understand that
its marksmanship was not what it ought to be. I think the facts will
bear me out.
The thing to do is to remember what Emerson says, that in the long
run an unpleasant truth is a very much safer companion than even the
pleasantest falsehood. Our pride in what was done in the past should
not permit us to be led away into blindness by failure to appreciate
whatever was wrong in the past. Read what Washington said about the
average militia regiment of the Revolutionary War, and you will not
find he used complimentary language. It was because our people declined
to accept Washington’s judgment on the militia, and persisted in
trying the experiment of fighting the War of 1812 with militia, that
the first two years of that war resulted not merely disastrously, but
shamefully, and among other things resulted in the burning of the city
of Washington. We did not begin to win on land until we had evolved
through mighty hard knocks a small army under Brown and Scott on the
northern frontier, which, when evolved, proved able to do what no
Continental army at that time could do, that is, meet to advantage
the best troops of Britain. We won at sea because we had a number of
frigates and sloops which had been built more than fifteen years before
and whose officers had been trained in the school of their profession
at sea and in action. We won these victories because we had the fleet;
and if the fleet had been bigger we would not have had to fight the war
at all.
Now, I ask that societies like this teach the truth; teach the truth
that helps, even if it hurts a little in the helping. Take our struggle
in building up our Navy to its present strength. We were hampered in
that struggle by the ignorant and unspeakably foolish belief that
somehow or other America was so big and smart a Nation that we did not
need a Navy, and could improvise one out of hand if the need ever arose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account