Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 4 (of 7)Roosevelt, Theodore
History
Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 4 (of 7)
Roosevelt, Theodore
Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919; United States -- Politics and government -- 1901-1909
We can not consider the question of our foreign policy without at the
same time treating of the Army and Navy. We now have a very small
army—indeed, one wellnigh infinitesimal when compared with the army
of any other large nation. Of course the Army we do have should be as
nearly perfect of its kind and for its size as is possible. I do not
believe that any army in the world has a better average of enlisted
man or a better type of junior officer; but the Army should be trained
to act effectively in a mass. Provision should be made by sufficient
appropriations for manœuvres of a practical kind so that the troops may
learn how to take care of themselves under actual service conditions;
every march, for instance, being made with the soldier loaded exactly
as he would be in an active campaign. The generals and colonels
would thereby have opportunity of handling regiments, brigades, and
divisions, and the commissary and medical departments would be tested
in the field. Provision should be made for the exercise at least of
a brigade and by preference of a division in marching and embarking
at some point on our coast and disembarking at some other point and
continuing its march. The number of posts in which the Army is kept in
time of peace should be materially diminished and the posts that are
left made correspondingly larger. No local interests should be allowed
to stand in the way of assembling the greater part of the troops which
would at need form our field armies in stations of such size as will
permit the best training to be given to the personnel of all grades,
including the high officers and staff officers. To accomplish this
end we must have not company or regimental garrisons, but brigade and
division garrisons. Promotion by mere seniority can never result in
a thoroughly efficient corps of officers in the higher ranks unless
there accompanies it a vigorous weeding-out process. Such a weeding-out
process—that is, such a process of selection—is a chief feature of the
four years’ course of the young officer at West Point. There is no good
reason why it should stop immediately upon his graduation. While at
West Point he is dropped unless he comes up to a certain standard of
excellence, and when he graduates he takes rank in the Army according
to his rank of graduation. The results are good at West Point; and
there should be in the Army itself something that will achieve the same
end. After a certain age has been reached the average officer is unfit
to do good work below a certain grade. Provision should be made for
the promotion of exceptionally meritorious men over the heads of their
comrades and for the retirement of all men who have reached a given age
without getting beyond a given rank; this age of retirement of course
changing from rank to rank. In both the Army and the Navy there should
be some principle of selection, that is, of promotion for merit, and
there should be a resolute effort to eliminate the aged officers of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account