Pride and Passion: Robert Burns, 1759-1796Ferguson, J. De Lancey (John De Lancey)
History
Pride and Passion: Robert Burns, 1759-1796
Ferguson, J. De Lancey (John De Lancey)
Burns, Robert, 1759-1796
‘There is a certain irregularity in the Old Scotch Songs, a
redundancy of syllables with respect to that exactness of accent
and measure that the English Poetry requires, but which glides in,
most melodiously with the respective tunes to which they are set. For
instance, the fine old song of “The Mill Mill O,” to give it a plain
prosaic reading, it halts prodigiously out of measure; on the other
hand, the song set to the same tune in Bremner’s collection of Scotch
Songs which begins “To Fanny fair could I impart,” &c., it is most
exact measure, and yet, let them both be sung before a real critic,
one above the biasses of prejudice, but a thorough Judge of Nature,
how flat and spiritless will the last appear, how trite, and lamely
methodical, compared with the wild-warbling cadence, the heart-moving
melody of the first. This particularly is the case with all those
airs which end with a hypermetrical syllable. There is a degree of
wild irregularity in many of the compositions and fragments which
are daily sung to them by my compeers, the common people--a certain
happy arrangement of Old Scotch syllables, and yet, very frequently,
nothing, not even _like_ rhyme, or sameness of jingle at the ends of
the lines. This has made me sometimes imagine that perhaps, it might
be possible for a Scotch Poet, with a nice, judicious ear, to set
compositions to many of our most favorite airs ... independent of
rhyme altogether....’
With nothing except mother-wit and a sure ear to guide him, Burns
had reached conclusions regarding poetic rhythm at complete variance
with the critical theories of his century and beyond the practice
of even nineteenth-century orthodoxy. He had recognized that the
real charm of folk-poetry lies in the fact that it is musical rather
than regular. In an age when the essence of poetry was thought to
abide in the accurately counted syllables of the heroic couplet such
an opinion would have seemed not merely heresy but sheer insanity.
Compared with it, Coleridge’s supposed innovation of hypermetrical
syllables in _Christabel_ is timid conventionality. Blake alone among
Burns’s contemporaries had bolder theories of rhythm, and his work,
which the Scotsman never saw, had to wait more than half a century
for recognition. Burns later expended much time and ink in trying to
persuade George Thomson that a song could be poetry even if all its
lines did not count up the same number of syllables, but he was never
optimistic enough to offer that silly body a lyric which dispensed with
rime.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account