Art, Prehistoric; Folk literature -- History and criticism
Two styles of these paintings may be distinguished; one in which the
five crosswise fields are so treated that the patterns on the three
central rectangular fields (2, 3, 4) are at right angles to those in
the two extreme fields (1, 5). In the central fields the long sides
of the rectangles run parallel to the narrow side of the hide and in
the outer ones, the rectangles are turned so that the long sides are
parallel to the long side of the hide. The central lengthwise field
extends only over the three middle fields and is very narrow (figs.
14, 144, _a_, _b_). The only ornament on fig. 144 _b_ is the rectangle
with two obtuse triangles facing at the apex. To the four rectangles
on 2, 3, 4 correspond four corresponding ones in the fields 1 and
5. In fig. 144 _a_ there is an alternation of two designs in these
fields. There are two triangles with protruding lines with complex
frames, and rectangles with the obtuse triangles transformed into
segments. The central dividing line in these rectangles is missing. It
will be noticed that here also the number of rectangles in the three
inner fields (2, 3, 4) corresponds to the number in the outer fields
(1 and 5), but their order is reversed. Left and right triangles in
the outer fields (1 and 5) are also in reverse positions. The narrow
central field is occupied by a single acute triangle. In fig. 145 _b_
we have a similar arrangement, but in place of the rectangle with
obtuse triangles, we find a new arrangement of acute triangles. Fig.
14 (p. 27) differs from those just described in that the central field
is divided into two divisions instead of four. The obtuse triangles
in the four corners are treated somewhat differently and the figure
between them in the middle of the short side is treated as though the
essential design were the diamond, not the obtuse triangle. The heart
shaped design and the star like figures give the impression of a new
development of older patterns.
[Illustration: Fig. 146. Painted rawhides, Sauk and Fox.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account