Primitive Athens as described by ThucydidesHarrison, Jane Ellen
History
Primitive Athens as described by Thucydides
Harrison, Jane Ellen
Athens (Greece) -- Antiquities; Athens (Greece) -- Description and travel
At the right hand of the entrance to Y was a passage, e-f, leading down
by steps into a large elliptical chamber, r⁶. This chamber, presumably a
cistern, was paved in Roman days with marble slabs, but below the marble
pavement is a stucco pavement of Greek date. From this cistern leads a
channel, i, which may have led to the well-house of Peisistratos, or, as
suggested in the restoration (Fig. 43), to a smaller subordinate fountain.
The supply of water at Kallirrhoë was slender. We have seen that efforts
were made to reinforce it by well-sinking, by conduits, by cisterns. But,
though the Athenians found the water of Kallirrhoë adequate for their
ritual baths, they had other needs, and, as the city grew and grew, the
effort to cope locally with the increasing demand proved futile. There
was a crying need for water from a distance, a great popular need such
as the despots loved to supply. Water was needed, and water was brought
in a supply practically inexhaustible, from the district of the upper
Ilissos.
* * * * *
By a happy chance in the history of excavations, long before the search
for the aqueduct of the despots began, another aqueduct, the work of
another despot, had been brought to light—the aqueduct that Polycrates
made for the Samians. At the close of his account of Polycrates,
Herodotus[267] tells us he had lingered long over the affairs of the
Samians ‘because they possessed three of the most wonderful works ever
accomplished by the Greeks.’ The first and the only one of these wonders
that concerns us was a great aqueduct bored through a mountain 150
fathoms high. The length of the tunnel, he goes on to say, was seven
stadia, the height and the breadth eight feet each way. Through this
tunnel there went a second passage, 20 cubits deep by three feet wide,
through which the water is carried along in tiled pipes from a great
spring to the city of Samos. The architect of this tunnel was a Megarean,
Eupalinos, son of Naustrophos.
Possibly, _pace_ Herodotus, even if the Samians had had no aqueduct he
would anyhow have told us the story of the ring; be that as it may,
his account of the first wonder, the aqueduct, is invaluable, and has
been fully substantiated. Never was a town by nature worse off for its
water-supply than Samos, and rarely has one been supplied by a more
astonishing piece of engineering. The ‘great spring’ Hagniades has been
found[268], the tunnel with its double channel, even the very earthenware
pipes laid down by Eupalinos. We know perfectly well what to expect in an
aqueduct made by the despots.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account