Primitive Athens as described by ThucydidesHarrison, Jane Ellen
History
Primitive Athens as described by Thucydides
Harrison, Jane Ellen
Athens (Greece) -- Antiquities; Athens (Greece) -- Description and travel
Of cardinal importance to us is the point at which the conduit debouches,
because near to that point we may hope to find the fountain-house
‘Nine-Spouts.’ The conduit ends in an arrangement which is somewhat
surprising, and which will be best understood by reference to Fig. 38.
To the extreme left, at a point near letter B, the conduit emerges. It
here consists of a massive channel built of blocks of _poros_ stone,
indicated by the thick black lines on the plan. At point a⁴ it ends in
the Pnyx rock. But, and this is the odd thing, at a³, about eight metres
before the channel ends, a pipe issues from the stone channel and running
parallel to the Pnyx rock conducts the water to the main reservoir
(Haupt-Bassin). A similar arrangement has been observed in the aqueduct
at Samos. There, too, the conduit pipe leaves the rock channel before it
ends. It is conjectured[272] that this was a plan intended to mislead an
enemy who might desire to cut off the water-supply.
The conduit actually debouches at a⁵ into the great reservoir from which
the new fountain-house Nine-Spouts must have been fed. Here, at the
reservoir, we find indications of three successive structures. First
a structure of very early date, possibly of the time of Solon. Second
that of Peisistratos. Third a late Roman structure. Of the two earlier
structures no masonry remains, but the position and dimensions can
roughly be made out by markings on the Pnyx rock, out of which the West
side of the basin was hewn. The exact size of the original basin, which
was smaller than the later one, cannot now be determined. In the time of
Peisistratos it was enlarged and deepened; the floor of the basin was
sunk nearly 1·50 metres deeper. The great basin of Peisistratos was lined
with masonry, the blocks of which have now disappeared. In Roman days
the place of the great basin of Peisistratos was taken by a quite small
structure. This change must have taken place before the building of the
late Roman villa which occupied the place where once the ‘Nine-Founts’
stood. When the villa was built the great reservoir had for some time
been disused, and the water from the aqueduct, not being needed on the
spot in any large quantity, was carried by pipes to the lower city to the
North for the supply of the new Roman market-place. These alterations
as to water-supply, it should be noted, are of the first importance in
questions of topography, and change in the direction or the extension of
an aqueduct is naturally the index of a shifting of population.
[Illustration: FIG. 38.]
The restoration by Professor Dörpfeld (Fig. 38) is, it must clearly be
understood, to a large extent conjectural. It must be consulted strictly
in conjunction with the plan in Fig. 35, where the actual remains of
Greek date are clearly marked in solid black lines. So used it can be of
great service in helping us mentally to reconstruct scattered fragments
of masonry that would otherwise be unintelligible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account