Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoplesNilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
History
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples
Nilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
Chronology
With the two opening days of the calendar and the one division in
the middle are often combined the three great sacrificial feasts,
the autumn festival at the winter nights, the Yule festival at
mid-winter, and the spring festival at the summer nights. It is
true that the first of these festivals, which was celebrated at the
beginning of a period of rest after the completion of the harvest
and agricultural labour, denoted, as such festivals often do, the
conclusion of the old year and the beginning of the new. That it was
fixed for a definite day cannot be demonstrated any more than that
the festival of victory in spring, celebrated before the Vikings
went forth on their voyages, fell exactly on the summer night. On
the contrary the time probably varied according to circumstances:
the expression of Snorre lacks calendarial accuracy and remains
indefinite:--“They should sacrifice against the winter to get a
good year, and at mid-winter sacrifice for germination; the third
sacrifice in summer, and this was a sacrifice of victory”[339]. In
historical times the Yule festival is regulated by the Christian
calendar; Snorre says that in heathen times it was celebrated
at the _hökku_ night, but of this we have no certain knowledge.
Things happened as in the Middle Ages and later: after a calendar
has arisen the festivals are regulated by this, but they are not
calendar-festivals, and in reconstructing the scheme of the calendar
from the festivals very great caution must be exercised.
Our conclusion is that the Germanic seasons, like the seasons in
general, were not in themselves definitely limited divisions of time,
and that alongside of the greater seasons smaller ones arose without
there being any numerical determination of the relationship between
the two. Seasons only become divisions consisting of a definite
number of days when in the regulation of the calendar they are taken
over as calendar divisions, as winter and summer were in Scandinavia.
Where a calendar has arisen directly out of the seasons, the
divisions, like the seasons, are of varying length[340]. This also
shews that the Germanic seasons first attained a definite number of
days through the calendar-regulation introduced from abroad. Further,
when a calendar existed, the beginning of the seasons could be given
with reference to this: the day varied according to circumstances,
but the choice was limited in this manner, viz. that only a popular
festival or saint’s day was appropriate as a distinguishing day.
Here also, therefore, the calendar was the starting-point for the
regulation of the seasons. A division of the year in the more
accurate sense also first arose through the regulation of the
calendar, since, owing to the method of calculation, the middle
days of the half-year divisions became distinguishing days in
the calendar. When the calendar came, the old festivals were also
regulated by it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account