=163. Porosity in Relation to Water Movement.=—The intimate relation
which water movement in a soil bears to fertility makes highly important
the analytical study of this feature of porosity. A soil deficient in
plant food, in so far as chemical analysis is concerned, will produce
far better crops when the flow of moisture is favorable than a highly
fertile soil in which the water may be in deficiency or excess.
Aside from the actual rain-fall the texture of the soil, in other words
its porosity, is the most important factor in determining the proper
supply of moisture to the rootlets of plants. Even where the rain-fall
is little, a properly porous soil in contact with a moist subsoil will
furnish the moisture necessary to plant growth. This fact is well
illustrated by the beet fields in Chino Valley, California. In this
locality most excellent crops of sugar beets are produced without
irrigation and almost without rain.
=164. Methods of Water Movement=—The translocation of soil water is
occasioned in at least two ways; namely,
1. By changing the porosity of a given stratum of soil.
2. By changing the amount of water a given stratum contains.
The following experiment by King[113] illustrates a convenient method of
studying this movement of water:
On a rich fallow ground of light clay soil, underlaid at a depth of
eighteen inches by a medium-grained sand, water, to the amount of two
pounds per square foot on an area of eight by eight feet, was slowly
added with a sprinkler, samples of soil having been previously taken in
six-inch sections down to a depth of three feet. The samples were taken
along a diagonal of the square under experiment and one foot apart. The
middle sample of the line being from the center of the area. The
sampling and wetting occurred between one and three P. M., on July 22,
and on the evening of the 23 a corresponding series of samples was taken
along a line parallel to the first but eight inches distant. The changes
in the percentages of water in the soil are given in the following
table, showing the translocation of water in soil due to wetting the
surface:
PER CENT OF WATER. DIFFERENCE.
Inches. Before After In per cent. In pounds per
wetting. wetting. cu. ft.
0–6 14.00 22.23 +8.23 +2.873
6–12 15.14 15.71 +0.57 +0.199
12–18 16.23 15.75 –0.48 –0.213
18–24 17.70 16.92 –0.78 –0.347
24–30 16.76 14.41 –2.35 –1.032
30–36 15.51 15.21 –0.30 –0.132
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account