=273. Separation with a Magnet.=—Particles of magnetic iron oxid are
easily separated from the fine soil particles by means of a magnet. A
strong bar or horseshoe magnet may be used. Electro-magnets are rarely
necessary except for the separation of particles of feeble magnetic
power. Particles of iron which may be found would owe their origin to
the mortars in which the soil had been pulverized, or they might come
from a recently crushed meteorite. Some minerals, as limonite, after
ignition are attracted by the magnet and it is advisable to subject a
part of the sample to this treatment. The best method of separation
consists in spreading the particles evenly on paper and gradually
bringing the magnetic particles to one side by moving the magnet
underneath.
=274. Color and Transparency.=—But little can be learned from the color
and transparency of the smallest silt particles, but these properties in
the larger grains have considerable diagnostic value. Many minerals of
distinct color appear wholly colorless in petrographic sections or in
silt particles, as for instance, highly-colored quartz. On the other
hand, even the smallest particle of chlorite will show its distinctive
tint. The colors in some minerals are due to occluded matter not
essential to their structure, and these foreign bodies would naturally
escape when the crystal mass is reduced to an almost impalpable powder.
=275. Value of Silt Analyses.=—As in the case of chemical analyses a
silt analysis of a soil which is not typical or representative has
little value. On the other hand, a systematic separation of soils into
classes of particles can not fail to reveal a definite correspondence of
mechanical composition to soil properties. The production of a crop is
the result of certain functions, chief among which are temperature,
moisture, and plant food. In a given soil the temperature is markedly
affected by its physical state. It has been demonstrated in previous
paragraphs that the circulation of moisture in the soil and its capacity
to be held therein are chiefly functions of the state of aggregation of
the soil itself. The availability of plant food in a soil is not
measured by its quantity alone, but rather by its state of subdivision.
It is not therefore a matter of surprise that the fertility of a soil is
found, _caetèris paribus_, to be commensurate to a certain limit with
the percentage of fine silt and clay which it contains. It is true that
two soils quite different in fertility, may have approximately the same
silt percentages, but in such a case it is demonstrable that even in the
poorer soil the measure of fertility is largely the percentage of fine
particles and not its actual content of plant food. In other words,
almost all soils, even the poorest, have still large quantities of plant
food, but these stores, owing to certain physical conditions, are not
accessible to the rootlets of plants. An illustration of this is seen in
the use of concentrated fertilizers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account