In each of two flasks marked at 100 and 200 cubic centimeters,
respectively, are placed 65.52 grams of milk, four cubic centimeters
of mercuric nitrate added, the volume completed to the mark and the
contents of the flask well shaken.
After filtering, the polarization is made in a 400 millimeter tube
by means of the triple shadow polariscope described in =75=. From
the reading thus obtained the volume of the precipitate and the
degree of correction to be applied are calculated as in the subjoined
example. The flasks should be filled at near the temperature at which
the polarizations are made and the observation room must be kept at
practically a constant temperature of 20° to avoid the complications
which would be produced by changes in the gyrodynat of lactose and
the value of the quartz plates and wedges of the apparatus by marked
variations in temperature.
_Example._—Weight of milk used in each case 65.52 grams.
Polarimetric reading from the 100 cubic centimeter flask, 20°.84
” ” ” ” 200 ” ” ” 10°.15
Then 10.15 × 2 = 20.30
20.84 - 20.30 = 0.54
0.54 × 2 = 1.08
20.84 - 1.08 = 19.76
19.76 ÷ 4 = 4.94,
which is the corrected reading showing the percentage of lactose in the
sample used.
The volume of the precipitate is calculated as follows:
20.84 ÷ 4 = 5.21, the apparent percentage of lactose present.
Then 5.21: 4.94 = 100: _x_.
Whence _x_ = 94.82. From this number it is seen that the true volume of
the milk solution polarized is 94.82 instead of 100 cubic centimeters,
whence the volume occupied by the precipitate is 100 - 94.82 = 5.18
cubic centimeters. So little time is required to conduct the analysis
by the double dilution method as to render it preferable in all cases
where incontestable data are desired. Where arbitrary corrections are
made the volume allowed for the precipitate may vary from two and a
half cubic centimeters in milks poor in fat, to six for those with a
high cream content.
For milks of average composition sufficient accuracy is secured by
making an arbitrary correction of five cubic centimeters for the volume
of the precipitate.
SEPARATION OF SUGARS BY CHEMICAL AND CHEMICAL-OPTICAL METHODS.
=245. Conditions of Separation.=—In the foregoing paragraphs the
optical methods for determining certain sugars have been described.
Many cases arise, however, in which these processes are inapplicable or
insufficient. In these instances, the analyst, as a rule, will be able
to solve the problem presented by the purely chemical methods which
have been previously described, or by a combination of the chemical
and optical processes. Not only have the different sugars distinctive
relations to polarized light, but also they are oxidized by varying
quantities of metallic salts and these differences are sufficiently
pronounced to secure in nearly every instance, no matter how complex,
data of a high degree of accuracy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account