Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
Even when Coleridge is most ‘the God-intoxicated man’ his remarks
to a careful reader suggest that if they could be decoded, as
it were, they would provide at the least a basis for interesting
speculation. Many adumbrations of this mystical view might be
quoted. “There is a communication between mystery and mystery,
between the unknown soul and the unknown reality; at one particular
point in the texture of life the hidden truth seems to break
through the veil”, writes Mr Middleton Murry in an Essay[94]
which as an emotive utterance disguised to resemble an argument
is of interest. How this feeling of insight arises we have seen
in the foregoing chapter; the sense of immediate revelation of
which he treats as “the primary stuff out of which literature
is created” is certainly characteristic of the greater kinds
of art. And there must be few who have not by one arrangement
or another contrived from these visionary moments a philosophy
which, for a time, has seemed to them unshakable because for
a time emotionally satisfying. But emotional satisfaction gained
at the cost of intellectual bondage is unstable. When it does
not induce a partial stupor it breaks down. The freely inquiring
mind has a fatal way of overthrowing all immediate and mystical
intuitions which, instead of being duly subordinate, insist on
giving it orders.
For the inquiring mind is simply the human being’s way of finding
a place and function for all its experiences and activities,
a place and function compatible with the rest of its experience.
When the mystical insight is understood, and its claims fitly
directed, although it may seem to those who still misunderstand
it to have lost all the attributes for which they have sought
to retain it, and to be no longer either mystical or an insight,
it does not lose but gains in value. But this further adjustment
is often very difficult to make.
These Revelation Doctrines, when we know what they are really
about, come nearer, we shall see, to supplying an explanation
of the value of the arts than any of the other traditional accounts.
But the process of translation is no easy matter. They are not
what they seem, these utterances apparently about Truth. In interpreting
them we shall find ourselves forced to consider language from
an angle and with a closeness which are not usual, and to do
so, certain very powerful resistances and deeply ingrained habits
of the mind have first to be broken down.
[85] _Shooting Niagara_.
[86] _Sartor Resartus_.
[87] _Essay on Style_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account