Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
The evil results, as Ribot remarks, are largely confined to those
individuals in whom the quest for pleasure has the force of an
obsession. But on the view of pleasure which we have indicated
above, it is clear that all those doctrines, very common in critical
literature, which set up pleasure as the goal of activity, are
mistaken. Every activity has its own specific goal. Pleasure very
probably ensues in most cases when this goal is reached, but that
is a different matter. To read a poem for the sake of the pleasure
which will ensue if it is successfully read is to approach it in an
inadequate attitude. Obviously it is the poem in which we should be
interested, not in a by-product of having managed successfully to read
it. The orientation of attention is wrong if we put the pleasure in
the forefront. Such a mistake is perhaps not common among instructed
persons, but to judge by many remarks which appear in reviews and
dramatic notices the percentage of instructed persons among reviewers
and theatre-goers does not seem high. This error, a legacy in part
from the criticism of an age which had a still poorer psychological
vocabulary[44] than Our own, is one reason why Tragedy, for example,
is so often misapproached. It is no less absurd to suppose that a
competent reader sits down to read for the sake of pleasure, than to
suppose that a mathematician sets out to solve an equation with a view
to the pleasure its solution will afford him. The pleasure in both
cases may, of course, be very great. But the pleasure, however great
it may be, is no more the aim of the activity in the course of which
it arises, than, for example, the noise made by a motor-cycle—useful
though it is as an indication of the way the machine is running—is the
reason in the normal case for its having been started.
This very common mistake noted, the significance of pleasure
and unpleasure may be insisted upon without misgiving. They are
our most delicate signs of how our activities are thriving. But
since even the most intense delight may indicate only a local
success and the activity be generally detrimental, they are signs
which need a very wary interpretation.
[41] Titchener, _Text-book of Psychology_, p. 248.
[42] Into conjectures as to what these are, it seems as yet not
profitable to enter.
[43] _Problèmes de Psychologie affective_, pp. 141-144.
[44] It is probable that Wordsworth and certain that Coleridge
if writing to-day would use quite other terms in place of pleasure
for describing poetic values.
CHAPTER XIII
Emotion and the Cœnesthesia
They are the silent griefs that cut the heart-strings.
_The Broken Heart_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account