Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
The extent to which any activity is conscious seems to depend
very largely upon how complex and how novel it is. The primitive
and in a sense natural outcome of stimulus is action; the more
simple the situation with which the mind is engaged, the closer
is the connection between the stimulus and some overt response
in action, and in general the less rich and full is the consciousness
attendant. A man walking over uneven ground, for example, makes
without reflection or emotion a continuous adjustment of his
steps to his footing; but let the ground become precipitous and,
unless he is used to such places, both reflection and emotion
will appear. The increased complexity of the situation and the
greater delicacy and appropriateness of the movements required
for convenience and safety, call forth far more complicated goings
on in the mind. Besides his perception of the nature of the ground,
the thought may occur that a false move would be perilous and
difficult to retrieve. This, when accompanied by emotion, is
called a ‘realisation’ of his situation. The adjustment to one
another of varied impulses—to go forward carefully, to lie down
and grasp something with the hands, to go back, and so forth—and
their co-ordination into useful behaviour alters the whole character
of his experience.
Most behaviour is a reconciliation between the various acts which
would satisfy the different impulses which combine to produce
it; and the richness and interest of the feel of it in consciousness
depends upon the variety of the impulses engaged. Any familiar
activity, when set in different conditions so that the impulses
which make it up have to adjust themselves to fresh streams of
impulses due to the new conditions, is likely to take on increased
richness and fullness in consciousness.
This general fact is of great importance for the arts, particularly
for poetry, painting and sculpture, the representative or mimetic
arts. For in these a totally new setting for what may be familiar
elements is essentially involved. Instead of seeing a tree we
see something in a picture which may have similar effects upon
us but is _not_ a tree. The tree impulses which are aroused
have to adjust themselves to their new setting of other impulses
due to our awareness that it is a _picture_ which we are
looking at. Thus an opportunity arises for those impulses to
define themselves in a way in which they ordinarily do not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account