Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
But with this example we have broken down the limitation to the
mere sound, to the strictly formal or sensory aspect of word
sequences, and in fact the limitation is useless. For the effect
of a word as sound cannot be separated from its contemporaneous
other effects. They become inextricably mingled at once.
The sound gets its character by compromise with what is going
on already. The preceding agitation of the mind selects from
a range of possible characters which the word might present,
that one which best suits with what is happening. There are no
gloomy and no gay vowels or syllables, and the army of critics
who have attempted to analyse the effects of passages into vowel
and consonantal collocations have, in fact, been merely amusing
themselves. The way in which the sound of a word is taken varies
with the emotion already in being. But, further, it varies with
the sense. For the anticipation of the sound due to habit, to
the routine of sensation, is merely a part of the general expectancy.
Grammatical regularities, the necessity for completing the thought,
the reader’s state of conjecture as to what is being said, his
apprehension in dramatic literature of the action, of the intention,
situation, state of mind generally, of the speaker, all these
and many other things intervene. The way the sound is taken is
much less determined by the sound itself than by the conditions
into which it enters. All these anticipations form a very closely
woven network and the word which can satisfy them all simultaneously
may well seem triumphant. But we should not attribute to the
sound alone virtues which involve so many other factors. To say
this is not in the least to belittle the importance of the sound;
in most cases it is the key to the effects of poetry. This texture
of expectations, satisfactions, disappointments, surprisals,
which the sequence of syllables brings about, is rhythm. And
the sound of words comes to its full power only through rhythm.
Evidently there can be no surprise and no disappointment unless
there is expectation and most rhythms perhaps are made up as
much of disappointments and postponements and surprises and betrayals
as of simple, straightforward satisfactions. Hence the rapidity
with which too simple rhythms, those which are too easily ‘seen
through’, grow cloying or insipid unless hypnoidal states intervene,
as with much primitive music and dancing and often with metre.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account