80 An intermediate dealer can, so far as he is himself concerned, attribute value in exchange to goods only to the extent that they have use for the last person who has acquired them. Hence, _Storch_ calls _value in use_ immediate, and _value in exchange_, mediate value. As the English are always wont to express the immediate in words of Germanic origin, and the mediate in words borrowed from the Latin, _Locke_ calls value in use “worth,” and value in exchange, simply “value.” (_K. Marx_, Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Œkonomie, 1867, I, 2.) 81 It is, of course, otherwise when, for instance, a beautiful sea view, or a desirable position as regards air and sunshine, is connected with a piece of land. 82 In Ravenna a cistern had greater value in exchange than a vineyard: _Martial_, III, 56. In Paris, too, drinking water, which is transported only with considerable trouble, costs 1-1/3 thalers per cubic meter. We may also mention snow and ice in summer, which last sells in the capitals of southern Europe at 0.34, silber groschens per pound. According to _Carey_, “utility” is the measure of man’s power over nature, “value,” the measure of nature’s power over man. He very inaccurately adds, that both are always in an opposite direction. (Principles of Social Science, 1861, VI, ch. 9.) 83 Hence _Ad. Müller_ calls value in use, individual value, and value in exchange, social value. The Germans call the value of goods whose value in use is recognized by only one person, _Affectionswerth_, (affection-value) a value which influences its value in exchange only when the individual who holds it in high esteem is not himself the possessor of the goods. An instance of this latter is a piece of paper covered with notes, intelligible only to the maker of them.