Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1Roscher, Wilhelm
History
Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1
Roscher, Wilhelm
Economics
call the soul, raw material, which receives productive power from
the labor of the teacher! For a calculation of the money value of
man in the different ages of life, see Statis. Journ. XVI, 43 ff.
See, on the other hand, _Malthus_, Definitions, ch. 7; and _Rossi_,
in the Journal des Economistes, VI, 113. Nor does the view of
_Ganilh_, Systèmes d’Economie politique (1809), I, 243; of _Ad.
Müller_, Concordia, 93 ff., 211; of _Hermann_, “Staatswirth”
Untersuchungen, No. 3; of _Dunoyer_, Liberté du Travail, L. VI; of
_Bastiat_, _Carey_ and others, who include pieces of land in
themselves under the head of capital, seem to be better founded.
_Hermann_ defines capital the durable basis of every utility
possessed of value in exchange. _Schäffle_ reckons land as nature
offers it to us, among _free_ goods. From the moment that labor and
capital are spent upon it, it becomes immovable capital, but he
concedes that it still preserves many essential points which
distinguish it from other capital. (N. Œk. Theorie der
ausschliessenden Absatzverhältnisse, 1867, 65 ff., 89 ff.) These
differences appear to me to be still more important than that which
land and capital have in common; especially as the historic
development of their relations proceeds for the most part in
opposite directions. Thus, for instance, as civilization advances,
land is wont to become dearer and capital cheaper. How difficult
would it be to introduce clearness into the ideas of _intensive_ and
_extensive_ agriculture, if land were accounted capital! And it is
not only always theoretically, but also very often, in practice,
possible to separate the value of a given piece of land from the
most durable capital-improvements (_Kapitalmeliorationen_) made on
it. It is only necessary to call to mind the area of buildings.
_ 270 Marx_ makes a very arbitrary assertion when he says that only the
capital operating in trade, and even only that operating in trade
where money is used as the instrument of exchange, can properly be
called capital; and that, therefore, the modern biography of capital
dates only from the 16th century, (Das Kapital I, 106 ff.)
271 See, on the other hand, _Wolkoff_, Lectures d’Economie politique
rationelle, 167.
_ 272 Hermann_ (II ed., 238 ff.) distinguishes especially _preparatory
contrivances_ auxiliary to labor, such as stationary structures
etc., vessels, tools, machines and instruments for measuring etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account