Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1Roscher, Wilhelm
History
Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1
Roscher, Wilhelm
Economics
309 I need cite only the instance of the slaves, who called out the
hours, thus performing the functions of a clock: _Martial_, VIII.
67; _Juvenal_, X. 216; _Petron._ 26; of the turning of water wheels,
in Egypt and Babylon, by human hands. _Strabo_, XVI. 738, XVII.,
807. Among the ancients, it required one shepherd, and shepherd boys
besides, to take care of twenty sheep. (_Geopon._ XVIII, 1.) In
highly cultivated regions, the number ran up to fifty. (_Demosth._,
adv. Euerg. et Mnes., 1155.) It seldom passed eighty (_Varro_, De re
rust., II. 10, 10. 2, 20), or one hundred (_Cato_, R.R. c. 10);
while, recently, five men are sufficient to take care of eighteen
hundred sheep. See _Roscher’s_ discourse on the relation of
Political Economy to classical antiquity, in the reports of the
Royal Saxon Science Association, May, 1849. Also _D. Hume_,
Discourses, No. 10.
310 The productive power of each of the factors of production has been
over-estimated by some schools. After _Gratian_ (c. i, C. XIII. qu.
i), had clearly recognized the necessary coöperation of the three
elements, there was in the one-sidedness with which the Reformers
emphasized God’s blessing as the only source of wealth, a great
over-estimation of the factor nature. The Mercantile System
over-estimated the factor capital, in one of its most obvious
component parts, money. In later times again: “_La terre est la
source ou la matière d’où l’on tire la ichesse; le travail de
l’homme est la forme qui la produit. Tous les hommes d’un état
subsistent et s’enrichissent aux dépens des propriétaires des
terres._” (_Cantillon_, Sur la Nature du Commerce, 1755, I. 33, 55.)
_La terre est l’unique source des richesses._ (_Quesnay_, Maximes
générales de Gouvernement, 1758, ch. 3.) In another place, indeed,
the same writer says: _les revenus sont le produit des terres et des
hommes (Grains_, p. 276, Daire), and _Mirabeau_ frequently laid
stress on the necessary coöperation of labor and capital.
(Landwirthschaftsphilosophie, translation by _Wichmann,_ I, 5.)
_Turgot_, Sur la Formation et Distribution des Richesses, § 7. For
an excellent refutation of this “Physiocratic” one-sidedness, which,
if all men are endowed by nature with equal rights, leads to
socialism, see _Canard_, Principes, 6. According to _Gioja_, N.
Prospetto, I. 35, the part played by labor, in the production of
_Parmesan_ cheese, is a thousand times as great as that played by
the soil; and in the production of a Dutch tulip, a hundred thousand
times as great. The English are wont, similarly, to over-estimate
the relative power of labor. (_Ponocratie_, after _Ancillon_, Essais
philosophiques, 1817, II. 327.) “Commerce and trade first spring
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account