Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 2Roscher, Wilhelm
General
Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 2
Roscher, Wilhelm
Economics
What portion of the total national income, after deduction is made of
rent, shall go to the capitalists and what portion to the working class,
will depend mainly on whether the capitalists compete more greedily for
labor or the laboring classes for capital.[183-3] If, for instance,
capital should increase more rapidly than population, there must be a
relative increase in wages, and _vice versa_.[183-4] This is true
especially of that peculiar kind of higher wages which we shall (§ 145,
ff.) designate as the "undertaker's profit." The smaller the number of
persons engaged in enterprises is, in comparison with the number of
retired persons who live on their rents, incomes, etc., the smaller is
the portion of the so-called net profit of enterprise the latter must be
satisfied with in the shape of interest.[183-5]
[Footnote 183-1: It is one of _Ricardo's_ (Principles, ch.
21) chief merits, that he demonstrated the groundlessness of
the opinion that the mere increase of capital must, on
account of the competition of capitalists, lower the rate of
interest, as is assumed by _Adam Smith_, I, ch. 9, _J. B.
Say_, Traité, II, 8, and others. Compare also, _John Stuart
Mill_, Principles, IV, ch. IV, 1.]
[Footnote 183-2: _Storch_, Handbuch, II, 20.]
[Footnote 183-3: Frequent withdrawals of capital must, other
circumstances being the same, temporarily raise the rate of
interest. In the long run, however, the question is decided
by this: whether public opinion considers labor a greater
sacrifice than the saving of capital. Compare _Roesler_,
loc. cit., 8.]
[Footnote 183-4: Compare _Hermann_, Staatsw. Unters., 240
ff. Very much depends on whether the new increased
consumption (of workmen when wages are rising, of
capitalists when wages are declining) is of goods which are
mainly the product of large capital, large factories, etc.,
or chiefly of common labor, (_von Mangoldt_, Grundriss, 155
seq.) When _Adam Smith_ suggests that the relation between
wages and the profit of capital is determined by this:
whether there is a market demand for more work or more
commodities, for more "work to be done" or "work done" (I,
ch. 7), he is, spite of appearances, very unsatisfactory.
_Malthus_ distinguishes a restrictive principle of the rate
of interest, viz.: the return made to the least productive
agricultural capital, and a regulative one, viz.: the
reciprocal relation between demand and supply of capital and
labor. (Principles, ch. 5, sec. 4.) _Ricardo_, ch. 6, makes
the profit of capital at all times and in every country
depend on the quantity of labor which it is necessary to
expend on the land which pays no rent, in order to satisfy
the wants of workmen--a very correct theory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account