Proceedings of the expedition to explore the northern coast of Africa, from Tripoly eastward : $b in MDCCCXXI. and MDCCCXXII., comprehending an account of the Greater Syrtis and Cyrenaica; and of the ancient cities composing the pentapolisBeechey, Frederick William
History
Proceedings of the expedition to explore the northern coast of Africa, from Tripoly eastward : $b in MDCCCXXI. and MDCCCXXII., comprehending an account of the Greater Syrtis and Cyrenaica; and of the ancient cities composing the pentapolis
Beechey, Frederick William
Sidra, Gulf of (Libya); Tripoli (Libya) -- Antiquities; Tripoli (Libya) -- Discovery and exploration
In considering the dimensions which have come down to us of the
Greater Syrtis, those allotted to it by Strabo (in the seventeenth
book) are so singularly inconsistent with each other, that there
appears to be no possible mode of reconciling the measurements
he has given of its diameter, with those which he has in the
same place ascribed to its circumference, without material
alterations in the text. “The circumference of the Greater
Syrtis” (observes the geographer) “is about nine hundred and
thirty stadia[1]; and its diameter, at the bottom of the Gulf,
is one thousand five hundred stadia: the breadth of the entrance
(or mouth) is about the same[2]:” that is, about fifteen hundred
stadia. Here we have a circumference considerably less than its
diameter, and no way of getting rid of a difficulty so formidable
to mathematicians, without making such decided alterations in the
text as no sober-minded editor would hazard[3]. Various readings
have been given, by different commentators, of this passage; but
it will be useless to compare their several merits; since both the
measurements in question will be found to be no less inconsistent
with the truth than they have been seen to be with each other. For
the actual circumference of the gulf of the Greater Syrtis may
be estimated at four hundred and twenty-two geographic miles, and
its diameter at two hundred and forty-six[4]: so that it would be
necessary to alter both the circumference and diameter given by
Strabo before any use could be made of his dimensions; and then the
measurements must be taken on the authority of the commentators,
since they would be no longer those of the geographer. In short,
the difficulty appears to be scarcely surmountable; for though it
is evident that the passage is not as Strabo left it, we have no
sufficient data for deciding what it really was originally[5]. The
measurements given by Pliny are somewhat nearer the truth[6]; indeed
his diameter of the gulf may be considered as remarkably accurate;
for it is stated at three hundred and thirteen Roman miles, equal
to two hundred and forty-eight and a quarter geographic miles,
and there is consequently no more than two miles and a quarter
difference between these dimensions and the actual diameter. His
circumference, however, is not by any means so accurate; it is given
at six hundred and twenty-five Roman miles, which are equal to four
hundred and ninety-four geographic miles, and will therefore leave a
difference of seventy-two geographic miles between this measurement
of the circuit and the actual one. The difference also exists
on the wrong side; that is to say, the whole distance of Pliny
is not only much more than the actual distance by observations,
but much more than the actual road-distance, which is the longest
which can be allowed. The diameter of the gulf, already stated,
of this author, will be found to coincide remarkably well with the
measurement which may be deduced from the distance he has given us
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account