Proceedings of the expedition to explore the northern coast of Africa, from Tripoly eastward : $b in MDCCCXXI. and MDCCCXXII., comprehending an account of the Greater Syrtis and Cyrenaica; and of the ancient cities composing the pentapolisBeechey, Frederick William
History
Proceedings of the expedition to explore the northern coast of Africa, from Tripoly eastward : $b in MDCCCXXI. and MDCCCXXII., comprehending an account of the Greater Syrtis and Cyrenaica; and of the ancient cities composing the pentapolis
Beechey, Frederick William
Sidra, Gulf of (Libya); Tripoli (Libya) -- Antiquities; Tripoli (Libya) -- Discovery and exploration
It will be seen that the principal danger of the Syrtes, according
to the passage above quoted from Strabo, consisted in the difficulty
of what is termed by seamen working off a lee-shore, for which the
vessels of the ancients were very ill adapted; and we can readily
believe, from what we have seen of the coast, that (under the
influence of the heavy surf which rolls over the shallows when
the wind blows strongly on shore) few vessels which chanced to
strike could escape. The inset into the gulf, at the same time,
being great, (when the north and east winds blow strongly against
the coast,) it must have been extremely difficult for vessels of
this description to avoid being drawn into its vortex; and indeed
we may observe that few ships will, at the present day, sail from
Bengazi, westward, when the wind is blowing strongly into the gulf,
on account of this consequent indraught[24].
“The improved state of navigation” (Major Rennell very justly
observes) “has, however, stripped the Syrtes of the greatest part
of their terrors;” and it is probable that the report of them
which we shall have from Captain Smyth will in consequence prove
to be much less formidable than the accounts which have descended
to us from the ancients.
It appears, from Mela, that the Syrtes were not only considered
to be dangerous on account of the frequent occurrence of shoals,
but more so in consequence of the flux and reflux of the sea which
we have already mentioned above[25]. This rise and fall (as we have
stated) can scarcely have been the customary motion of the tides;
but it may reasonably be supposed that the reaction of such a body
of water as must (under the influence of violent and continued
winds) have been driven over the low lands of the Greater Syrtis,
was occasionally very considerable. This may have been the reflux
(we imagine) alluded to; while the inset into the Gulf, caused
by strong winds blowing into it, may have been the rise which is
mentioned as the flux.
Of the indraught in question there can be no doubt; indeed, we may
remark that a rise of this nature is more or less observable in
gulfs in general; and when we consider that an unbroken sweep of
level ground, very slightly raised above the surface of the sea,
will be found extending itself on the western coast of the Greater
Syrtis for the space of a hundred miles in length, and occasionally
as much as fifteen in breadth, we may easily allow that the reflux
of the water, driven over a tract of such dimensions, may well be
considered as formidable.
It appears to be from the effect of the flux and reflux alluded to,
that the names by which the Gulfs of Syrtis are distinguished have
been derived; that is, if we may suppose them to be of Greek origin,
as Sallust and others have asserted[26].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account