This was the revolution in which America led the way and it had
astounding consequences. The American pioneer did not care for the
land--in two senses, for he neither loved it nor took care of it. The
European peasant had to nourish the soil before it would, in turn,
nourish him and his family; the American did not; he exhausted the
soil and left it, as a man unchivalrously leaves an aging wife for a
younger; there was so much land available that only an obstinate
unadventurous man would not try a hazard of new fortunes. This may be
morally reprehensible, but politically it had a satisfactory result:
the American farmer exhausted the soil, but did not let the soil
exhaust him; so that we established the tradition of waste, but
escaped the worse tradition of a stingy, frightened, miserly, peasant
class. The more aesthetic American critics of America never quite
forgave us for not having peasant arts and crafts, the peasant
virtues, the peasant sturdiness and all the rest of the good qualities
which go with slavery to the soil.
So the physical definition of America leads to these opening social
definitions:
we first destroyed the land-basis of wealth, position and
power;
we were the first nation to exhaust and abandon the soil;
we were supremely the great wasters of the world;
we were the first great nation to exist without a peasant class.
From this beginning we can go on to other effects:
our myths grew out of conquest of the land, not out of war
against neighboring states;
we created no special rights for the eldest son (as the younger
could find more and better land);
the national center of gravity was constantly changing as
population moved to take up new land;
we remained relatively unsophisticated because we were
constantly opening new frontiers;
our society, for the same reason, was relatively unstable;
we lived at half a dozen social levels (of comfort and
education, for instance) at the same time;
we created a "various" nation, and when the conditions of owning
and working land changed, we were plunged into a new kind of
political revolution, known then as the Populist movement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account