Professor W. G. Elmslie, D.D.: Memoir and SermonsElmslie, William Gray
Religion
Professor W. G. Elmslie, D.D.: Memoir and Sermons
Elmslie, William Gray
Elmslie, William Gray, 1848-1889; Sermons, English -- 19th century; Theologians -- Scotland -- Biography
That was the case with Esther. She was a Jewess. She owed her birth and
her breeding to that despised, exiled people. She had won her proud
position on the emperor's throne through the planning, and toiling, and
sacrifice of her Jewish guardian. And now her people's destiny hangs on
the balance. A deadly conspiracy against them has brought it about that
on a given day, rapidly approaching, there is to be a universal
merciless massacre of these defenceless Jews. And through the mouth of
her old revered guardian the demand comes to her—the one human being
that might have influence with the cruel king to cancel the decree and
save the lives of men, women, and children—at the risk and peril of her
own life in asking it, to go and intercede for them.
Hard! oh, how hard! Don't you judge harshly the poor queen when she
shrank away from it and could not face the stern summons. Think of it,
the young flesh, the soft heart—a woman's heart—within her, and think of
the cruel death by torture that was wont to be inflicted upon any one
that, unbidden, dared to force his way into the king's presence; coming,
too, in the bright noonday of all her good fortune. It would have been
easier to risk life when she was an unknown Jewish maiden; but oh, in
this good luck, this fortune, this love, this adulation, this
admiration, with her right fair beauty all upon her, to take it all and
go and confront grim death! it seemed too much to ask. And so Esther
began arguing within herself: Was she bound to hazard her life for these
Jews? After all, what had they done for her? They were her race, her
kindred, but what of that? Had she not come out from among them? Has not
destiny taken her lot and separated it from theirs? Why cannot she live
her own life apart from them? Why should she come down from the throne
and take her stand among them, exposed to cruel massacre and death? What
is the obligation? Where are the ties that bound her lot to theirs? Ay,
where were the ties of love and the obligations to generosity? They are
too fine and impalpable to be proved by argument. The moment you begin
discussing them or questioning them—ties that bind brother to brother,
sister to sister, child to parent—they vanish like life dissected for.
You destroy them. They have to be felt, not proved, but are more real,
more solemn, more important in determining a man's destinies than all
the legal bonds and moral obligations that bind him in society.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account