Professor W. G. Elmslie, D.D.: Memoir and SermonsElmslie, William Gray
Religion
Professor W. G. Elmslie, D.D.: Memoir and Sermons
Elmslie, William Gray
Elmslie, William Gray, 1848-1889; Sermons, English -- 19th century; Theologians -- Scotland -- Biography
I am confident if Christian men and women would but enrol themselves not
according to their meaner and unworthier inclinations, but in accordance
with the voice of duty and the promptings of all that is most noble and
generous in them, we should not have (as we do now) in the army of
Christ the vast majority ranking as incapable and non-efficient, while
only a small minority do the fighting and defending. Clearly my text
supposes that the mass will be strong and helpful, with only one or two
feeble, incompetent; just as in a flock of sheep the greater number are
healthy, whole, and able-bodied, while only a few are disabled and
lamed. It should be so in all our congregations. Perhaps in some the
ideal is fairly realised. But looking at the Church as a whole, do I
exaggerate in thinking that there are many, very many, who ought to be
able-bodied and aidful, but who regard themselves as exonerated from
active service, as incompetent to take part in any way in the warfare of
the Cross, as persons to be defended, not to help in the defence?
How is it with each of you? What is your habitual attitude when
goodness, truth, righteousness, Christ are assailed? In some social or
intellectual company where the followers of Christ are in the minority,
or it may be where you stand quite alone, you hear virtue or purity
sneered at, condemned; or justice and mercy ridiculed, discredited; or
the faith in things unseen rudely mocked and denied. Do you then always
bravely speak out for the glory and majesty of purity and goodness, for
the reality and grandeur of God and Christ? or do you yield to the
craven cowardice that lurks even in regenerate men, and, saying it is
for ministers, or apologists, or the strong and clever to defend Christ,
meanly hold your peace? So far from dreaming that you are bound to
defend the truth, you perhaps pity yourself for being subjected to such
trial, and admire your own fidelity, that can survive such assaults.
Instead of feeling yourself a coward, you rather regard yourself as a
martyr, a person much to be commiserated and admired, and wonder how the
Lord should so heartlessly expose your faith to such trials, while all
the time you are in reality a weak, ignoble recreant. But you may say,
"What! am I to speak when I know that I should only be ridiculed,
laughed at, beaten in argument, when I am certain my effort would be
defeated, rejected with ignominy?" But there is no necessity you should
argue; nay, if your arguments will be foolish or weak it is your duty to
keep them to yourself. But you are not bidden to argue, prove,
demonstrate anything; only you are to confess, to protest against evil,
and loyally side with the truth. And if you are not to do that except
when you know you will be applauded and triumphant, what of your
Master's conduct? He was laughed at, scorned, despised, rejected,
defeated, and He knew it all from the first. Brother, you are to "follow
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account