[33] _A Critical Account of the Philosophy of Lotze_, 1895, p. 104. [34] Aliotta, op. cit., pp. 89, 187. [35] _Encyl. Brit._, 'Psychology,' 11th ed., p. 577. [36] Ed. 1898, p. 90. [37] _Discours sur la Methode_, 1637, IVe Partie. [38] Aliotta, op. cit., p. 408. [39] Ed. 1893, vol. ii, p. 759. [40] _First Principles_, 6th ed., 1900, vol. i, p. 67. [41] Article, 'Moses,' in _Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart_, 1913. [42] Ed. Mangey, vol. i, pp. 44, 49. [43] Ibid., pp. 80-179. [44] Ibid., pp. 308, 427. [45] Ibid., pp. 213, 121, 562, 691. [46] _Conf._ x, 13, 2. [47] Autumn, 387. [48] _Conf._ 1, 6, 3; x, 27; x, 20. [49] _Conf._ xi, 13. [50] _Die Soziallehren der christlichen Kirchen und Gruppen_, 1912, pp. 263-5. [51] _De Fide_, Disp. xix, 7, 10; xx, 107, 194. [52] _Cognosci Te Stesso_, 1912, pp. 144-7. VI MORAL PROGRESS L. P. JACKS From the syllabus of all the lectures in this course I gather that every lecturer on the programme is dealing with the question of moral progress. This is inevitable. Each lecturer must show that the particular sort of progress he is dealing with is real or genuine progress, and this it cannot be unless it is moral. That is itself a significant fact and throws a valuable light on our subject. It shows that progress, as it is studied throughout the course, is not progress in the abstract, whatever that may mean, but progress _for us_ constituted as we are; and since our constitution is essentially moral all progress that we can recognize as such must be moral also. Science, Industry, Government, might all claim progress on their own ground and in their own nature, but this would not prove progress as we understand the word, unless it could be shown further that these things contribute to human betterment in the highest sense of the word. _Their_ progress might conceivably involve _our_ regress.