Organization among the working classes in Chile is in the formative
stage; yet even in its incipiency, unionism has proved itself to
be a dangerous political element and a serious menace to society.
The working classes are not sufficiently educated to appreciate the
responsibilities, or to enable them to direct with intelligence
and judgment, an organized force. The roto has little idea, and no
appreciation of obligation to his employer, to society, or to the
State; no regard for his word and little for the law. He is illiterate,
intemperate and superstitious. He is not lazy, but improvident, and
works because necessity prompts it, rather than for the purpose of
bettering his condition. He can neither be persuaded nor forced to
understand the importance of reporting for duty at a fixed hour for a
given number of days in the week. He is independent and clannish, and
has an exaggerated idea of his republican citizenship. His hatred of
foreign workmen is intense, and he will not stop short of murder, if
that be necessary, to prevent the “gringo” from coming into competition
with him. He is an apt pupil in the ethics of trades unions, in so
far as it applies to his side of the question. He believes that
the province of the union is to force shorter hours and more pay,
without giving in turn good and steady service. He has yet to learn
the commercial value of truth; the beneficial effects to himself of
personal industry, of rendering an honest day’s labor for his wage. He
must learn the good result of applying new methods to his work, and
also lessons of economy and providence. In short, he must join the
onmarching procession of industrial and commercial development before
he is qualified and competent to assert his authority and make demands
as an organized force. A dangerous phase of the labor union problem
is the fact that when encouraged by clever leaders and enforced by
numbers, the Roto Chileno is not slow to resort to violence.
The most serious charge made against labor organizations in Chile,
and one that is well founded is, that they do not seek to elevate
the standard of excellence among their members, or to better their
individual condition. Neither do they encourage temperance, and
obedience to law, or protection to society.
VINEYARDS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account