The incantations of Simaetha are of course a private rite to an
individual end. That the practice of such rites was very frequent long
before the decadent days of Theocritus is clear from the fact that
Plato[358] in the _Laws_ regards it as just as necessary that his ideal
state should make enactments against the man who tries to slay or injure
another by magic, as against him who actually does definite physical
damage. His discussion of the two kinds of evil-doing is curious and
instructive, both as indicating the prevalence of sorcery in his days,
and as expressing the rather dubious attitude of his own mind towards
such practices. ‘There are two kinds of poisoning in use among men, the
nature of which forbids any clear distinction between them. There is the
kind of which we have just now spoken, and which is the injury of one
body by another in a natural and normal way, but the other kind injures
by sorceries and incantations and magical bindings as they are called
(καταδέσεσι), and this class induces the aggressors to injure others as
much as is possible, and persuades the sufferers that they more than any
other are liable to be damaged by this power of magic. Now it is not easy
to know the whole truth about such matters, nor if one knows it is one
likely to be able lightly to persuade others. When therefore men secretly
suspect each other at the sight of, say, waxen images fixed either at
their doors or at the crossways or at the tombs of their parents, it
is no good telling them to make light of such things because they know
nothing certain about them.’ Evidently Plato is not quite certain as
to whether there _is_ something in witchcraft or not: a diviner or a
prophet, he goes on to admit, may really know something about these
secret arts. Anyhow, he is clear that they are deleterious and should be
stamped out if possible, and accordingly, any one who injures another
either by magical bindings (καταδέσεσιν) or by magical inductions
(ἐπαγωγαῖς) or by incantations (ἐπῳδαῖς) or by another form of magic is
to die.
The scholiast[359] on the Idyll of Theocritus just quoted knows that one
at least of the magical practices of Simaetha was also part of public
ritual:
‘The goddess at the crossways. Clash the gong.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account