But, though Plato and the poets and the mystics exalt the Siren,
‘half-angel and half-bird,’ to cosmic functions, yet, to the popular
mind, they are mainly things, if not wholly evil, yet fearful and to be
shunned. This is seen in the myth of their contest with the Muses[531].
Here they are the spirits of forbidden intoxication; as such on vases
they join the motley crew of Centaurs and Satyrs who revel with Dionysos.
They stand, it would seem, to the ancient as to the modern, for the
impulses in life as yet unmoralized, imperious longings, ecstasies,
whether of love or art or philosophy, magical voices calling to a man
from his ‘Land of Heart’s Desire’ and to which if he hearken it may be he
will return home no more—voices too, which, whether a man sail by or stay
to hearken, still sing on.
The Siren bird-woman transformed for ever by the genius of Homer into the
sweet-voiced demon of seduction may seem remote from the Ker of which
she is but a specialized form. A curious design[532] on a black-figured
cylix in the Louvre (fig. 41) shows how close was the real connection.
The scene is a banquet: five men are reclining on couches, two of them
separated by a huge _deinos_, a wine-vessel, from which a boy has drawn
wine in an oinochoë. Over two of the men are hovering winged figures,
each holding a crown and a spray; over two others hover bird-women, each
also holding a crown and a spray. What are we to call these ministrant
figures, what would the vase-painter himself have called them? Are the
human winged figures Love-gods, are the bird-women Sirens? For lack of
context it is hard to say with certainty. Thus much is clear, both kinds
of figures are favouring genii of the feast, and for our purpose this
is all-important: the bird-women, be they Sirens or not, and the winged
human figures, be they Love-gods or merely Keres, _perform the same
function_. The development of the Love-god, Eros, from the Ker will be
discussed later (Chap. XII.); for the present it is best to regard these
bird-women and winged sprites as both of the order of Keres, as yet
unspecialized in function.
[Illustration: FIG. 41.]
THE KER AS SPHINX.
Two special features characterize the Sphinx: she was a Harpy carrying
off men to destruction, an incarnate plague; she was the soothsayer
with the evil habit of asking riddles as well as answering them. Both
functions, though seemingly alien, were characteristic of underworld
bogeys; the myth-making mind put them together and wove out of the two
the tale of the unanswered riddle and the consequent deathly pest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account