So far the formula for Greek theology has been, ‘Man makes the gods in
his own image.’ Mythological development has proceeded on lines perfectly
normal, natural, intelligible. In so far as we understand humanity we can
predicate divinity. The gods are found to be merely magnified men, on the
whole perhaps better but with frequent lapses into worse, _quot homines
tot sententiae, quot sententiae tot dei_.
As man grew more civilized, his image, mirrored in the gods, grew more
beautiful and _pari passu_ the worship he offered to these gods advanced
from ‘aversion’ (ἀποτροπή) to ‘tendance’ (θεραπεία). But all along we
have been conscious that something was lacking, that even these exquisite
presentations of the Nymphs and the Graces, the Mother and the Daughter,
are really rather human than divine, that their ritual, whether of
ignorant and cruel ‘aversion’ or of genial ‘tendance,’ was scarcely in
our sense religious. These perfect Olympians and even these gracious
Earth-goddesses are not really Lords over man’s life who made them, they
are not even ghosts to beckon and threaten, they are lovely dreams, they
are playthings of his happy childhood, and when full-grown he comes to
face realities, from kindly sentiment he lets them lie unburied in the
lumber-room of his life.
Just when Apollo, Artemis, Athene, nay even Zeus himself, were losing
touch with life and reality, fading and dying of their own luminous
perfection, there came into Greece a new religious impulse, an impulse
really religious, the mysticism that is embodied for us in the two names
Dionysos and Orpheus. The object of the chapters that follow is to try
and seize, with as much precision as may be, the gist of this mysticism.
Dionysos is a difficult god to understand. In the end it is only the
mystic who penetrates the secrets of mysticism. It is therefore to poets
and philosophers that we must finally look for help, and even with this
help each man is in the matter of mysticism peculiarly the measure of his
own understanding. But this ultimate inevitable vagueness makes it the
more imperative that the few certain truths that can be made out about
the religion of Dionysos should be firmly established and plainly set
forth.
DIONYSOS AN IMMIGRANT THRACIAN.
First it is certain beyond question that Dionysos was a late-comer into
Greek religion, an immigrant god, and that he came from that home of
spiritual impulse, the North. These three propositions are so intimately
connected that they may conveniently be dealt with together.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account