It may possibly be objected that Maenads are not the same as either
Thyiades or Phoibades. My point is that they _are_. The substantial
basis of the conception is the actual women-worshippers of the god;
out of these were later created his mythical attendants. Such is the
natural order of mythological genesis. Diodorus[1013] like most modern
mythologists inverts this natural sequence, and his inversion is
instructive. In describing the triumphal return of Dionysos from India he
says: ‘And the Boeotians and the other Greeks and the Thracians in memory
of the Indian expedition instituted the biennial sacrifices to Dionysos
and they hold that at these intervals the god makes his epiphanies to
mortals. Hence in many towns of Greece every alternate year Bacchanalian
assemblies of women come together and it is customary for maidens to
carry the thyrsos and to revel together to the honour and glory of the
god, and the married women worship the god in organized bands and they
revel, and in every way celebrate the presence of Dionysos _in imitation
of the Maenads_ who from of old, it was said, constantly attended the
god.’ Diodorus is an excellent instance of mistaken mythologizing.
Mythology invents a reason for a fact, does not base a fact on a fancy.
It is not denied for a moment that the Maenads _became_ mythical. When
Sophocles sings[1014]:
‘Footless, sacred, shadowy thicket, where a myriad berries grow,
Where no heat of the sun may enter, neither wind of the winter blow,
Where the Reveller Dionysos with his nursing nymphs will go,’
we are not in this world, and his nursing nymphs are ‘goddesses’; but
they are goddesses fashioned here as always in the image of man who made
them.
* * * * *
The difficulty and the discrepancy of opinion as to the reality of the
Maenads are due mainly to a misunderstanding about words. Maenad is to us
a proper name, a fixed and crystallized personality; so is Thyiad, but in
the beginning it was not so. Maenad is the Mad One, Thyiad the Rushing
Distraught One or something of that kind, anyhow an adjectival epithet.
Mad One, Distraught One, Pure One are simply ways of describing a woman
under the influence of a god, of Dionysos. Thyiad and Phoibad obtained as
cultus names, Maenad tended to go over to mythology. Perhaps naturally
so; when a people becomes highly civilized madness is apt not to seem,
save to poets and philosophers, the divine thing it really is, so they
tend to drop the mad epithet and the colourless Thyiad becomes more and
more a proper name.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account