Plutarch[101], in discussing the nature of the sacred objects committed
to the care of the Vestal Virgins, makes the following notable statement:
‘Those who pretend to have most special knowledge about them (i.e. the
Vestal Virgins) assert that there are set there two jars (πίθοι) of no
great size, of which the one is open and empty, the other full and sealed
up, and neither of them may be seen except by these all-holy virgins. But
others think that this is false, and that the idea arose from the fact
that the maidens then placed most of their sacred things in two jars, and
hid them underground below the temple of Quirinus, and that the place
even now is called from that by the title _Pithisci_ (Doliola).’ We have
two other notices of these Doliola. Varro[102] says: ‘The place which is
called Doliola is at the Cloaca Maxuma, where people are not allowed to
spit. It is so called from the jars beneath the earth. Two accounts are
given of these jars: some say they contain the bones of dead bodies,
others that after the death of Numa Pompilius certain sacred objects
(religiosa quaedam) were buried there.’ Festus[103] gives substantially
the same account, but he says that the sacred objects were buried there
when the Gauls invaded the city.
Of jars containing ‘sacra’ we have in Greece no knowledge, but it is
significant to find that Zeus, who was the heir to so much antique
ritual, had on his threshold in Olympus two jars, one containing good the
other evil[104]:
‘Jars twain upon Zeus’ threshold ever stood;
One holds his gifts of evil, one of good.’
With some such notion as that of the Pithoigia must have been connected
the ceremony of the opening of the _mundus_ or round pit on the Palatine.
Festus[105] tells us that on three days in the year, August 24, October
5, November 6, the _lapis manalis_ that covered it was removed. Varro,
quoted by Macrobius[106], adds: ‘when the _mundus_ is open, the gate of
the doleful underworld gods is open.’
* * * * *
It has been shown that the ritual of each of the several days points
determinedly ghost-wards. The names in each case _admit_ at least of
chthonic interpretation. It remains to examine the collective name
_Anthesteria_.
The ancients sought and found what was to them a satisfactory etymology.
Istros, writing in the third century B.C. and quoted by Harpocration,
says that Anthesterion is the blossoming month because then ‘the most
of the things that spring from the earth blossom forth[107].’ The
_Etymologicon Magnum_[108] offers an easy-going alternative: feast and
month bear their names either because the earth then began to blossom, or
because they offered flowers at the festival.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account