felt to be _probable_, or else it would never have been narrated.
* * * * *
I have purposely dwelt on the dark side of ἐναγισμοί, of the service of
the placation of ghosts, because in the vengeance of the ghost exacted
for bloodshed lies the kernel of the doctrine of purification. But since
man’s whole activity is not bounded by revenge, ghosts have other and
simpler needs than that of vengeance. The service of the underworld is
not all _aversion_, there is also some element of _tendance_.
[Illustration: FIG. 10.]
In the vase-painting in fig. 10, a design from a rather late red-figured
krater in the Bibliothèque Nationale[182] in Paris, we have a
representation of a familiar scene, the raising of the ghost of Teiresias
by Odysseus, as described in the _Nekuia_. Vase-paintings of this date
tend to be rather illustrations than independent conceptions, but they
sometimes serve the purpose of vivid presentation. Odysseus[183] has
dug the trench, he has poured the drink-offering of mead and sweet wine
and water, and sprinkled the white meal, and he has slain the sheep;
the head and feet of one of them, seemingly a black ram, are visible
above the trench. He has sat him down sword in hand to keep off the
throng of lesser ghosts, and he and his comrades wait the up-rising of
Teiresias. Out of the very trench is seen emerging the bald ghost-like
head of the seer. This is a clear case, not of deprecation but of
invocation. Teiresias by the strength of the black blood returns to
life. There is a clear reminiscence of the ghost-raising[184] that went
on at many a hero’s tomb, for, as will later be seen in the discussion
of hero-worship, every hero was apt to be credited with mantic powers.
The victims slain are in a sense, as Homer calls them, ἱερήια; they
are sacrificed and eaten, but eaten by a ghost. As such they have been
accompanied by offerings that could only be intended for drink-offerings,
not the ἀπόνιμμα, the offscourings, but libations of mead and wine and
pure water. Here again the ghost is made in the image of man: the Homeric
hero drinks wine in his life and demands it after his death. The service
of the dead is here very near akin to that of the Olympians; it is no
grim atonement, but at worst a bloody banquet, at best a human feast, too
human, too universal to need detailed elucidation. It is a ritual founded
on a belief deep-rooted and long-lived; with the Greeks it was alive in
Lucian’s[185] days. Charon asks Hermes why men dig a trench, and burn
expensive feasts, and pour wine and honey into a trench. Hermes answers
that he cannot think what good it can do to those in Hades, but ‘anyhow
people believe that the dead are summoned up from below to the feast, and
that they flutter round the smoke and fat and drink the honey draught
from the trench.’ Here the ghosts invade the late and popular burnt
sacrifice of the Olympians, but the principle is the same.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account